My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2001-020 RDA 2001-002
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2001
>
Reso 2001-020 RDA 2001-002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2012 5:21:32 PM
Creation date
7/14/2010 11:39:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
2/5/2001
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
POTENTIALLY <br />ISSUES POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS THAN NO <br /> SIGNIFICANT UNLESS SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SOURCES <br /> ISSUES MITIGATION IMPACT <br /> INCORPORATED <br />EXPLANATION: The project area is generally developed with a mixture of residential, office, public, commercial and retail uses, <br />which are currently served by existing public services. Both residential and non-residential developments will be required to pay the <br />state-mandated school impact fees, which are collected at the time of issuance of building permits. In addition, the Strategy identifies <br />a need for development of a neighborhood park within the study area. Because the proposed development is to occur in an area that <br />is already served by existing public services and would occur at an overall densitylintensity that does not exceed projections, <br />potential impacts to public services related to future development projects are anticipated to be less than significant. <br />12.' UTILITIES ANDSERVICE SYSTEMS. Would'-t he ro'ect: <br />a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of X 2 <br />the applicable Regional Water Quality Control <br />Board? <br />b. Require or result in the construction of new X 2 <br />water or wastewater treatment facilities or <br />expansion of existing facilities, the construction <br />of which could cause significant <br />environmental effects? - - <br />c. Require or result in the construction of new X 2 <br />storm water drainage facilities or expansion of <br />existing facilities, the construction of which <br />could cause si ificant environmental effects? <br />d. Have sufficient water supplies available to X 2 <br />serve the project from existing entitlements and <br />resources, or are new or expanded entitlements <br />needed? <br />e. Result in a determination by the wastewater X 2 <br />treatment provider which serves or may serve <br />the project that it has adequate capacity to serve <br />the project's projected demand in addition to the <br />rovider's existin commitments? <br />f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted X 2 <br />capacity to accommodate the project's solid - <br />waste disposal needs? <br />g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes X 2 <br />and re ations related to solid waste? <br />h.. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes X 2 <br />and regulations related to discharge of storm <br />waters? <br />EXPLANATION: The project area is generally developed with a mixture of residential, office, public, commercial and retail uses, <br />which are currently served by existing utilities and service systems. The City Engineer indicates that wastewater capacity in the <br />project area is more than adequate to meet the needs of future development. Overall, the Strategy Area would develop at <br />densities/intensities that are at or below levels anticipated by existing environmental documents (General Plan and Final EIR for <br />Plaza 2 Redevelopment Area). Therefore, potential impacts to utilities and service systems related to future development projects are <br />anticipated to be less than significant. <br />13: RECREATION,' <br />a. Would the project increase the use of existing X 2 <br />neighborhood and regional parks or other <br />recreational facilities such that substantial <br />physical deterioration of the facility would <br />occur or be accelerated? <br />CSL/BART Revitalization Strategy - IS/ND 13 December/2000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.