My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RDA Reso 2000-025
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2000
>
RDA Reso 2000-025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2010 10:53:53 AM
Creation date
9/13/2010 10:02:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
7/17/2000
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Inst 2001161041
(Approved)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Recorded Documents\2000
Reso 2000-112
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The income approach is based upon the income and cost characteristics of the Project. For the <br /> purpose of determining the reuse value of the land, the residual value can be defined as the <br /> difference between the development cost of the Project, excluding land, and the value of the <br /> Project (total amount the developer can reasonably afford to invest). The amount the developer <br /> • can reasonably afford to invest is based upon the projected net operating income revenue <br /> generated by the Project and the value of the Project at completion. <br /> The economics of the proposed Project must be determined on the basis of the costs and revenues <br /> generated by the Project. This section of the report presents the estimates of the development <br /> costs and revenues and the assumptions made to determine these estimates. <br /> A. Development Costs <br /> Development cost estimates are based on information provided by the Developer, Creekside <br /> Associates, LLC. KivLA has not conducted an independent evaluation of the direct construction <br /> costs for the shell, tenant improvements and site work and KMMA recommends that a signed <br /> construction contract be submitted to the Agency prior to close of escrow. The Developer <br /> represents that the construction cost budget reflects the costs to meet the high quality design <br /> requirements. <br /> Table 1 presents the estimated direct and indirect development costs for the Project. These <br /> components are to be financed and owned by the Developer. As shown in Table 1, the total • <br /> development costs, before land, are estimated at 527,845,800, or S137 per square foot of rentable <br /> building area. The major assumptions behind the development cost estimate are as follows: <br /> • The shell cost, exclusive of tenant improvements, is estimated to average S60 per <br /> sq. ft. of gross building area. <br /> • In addition, the Developer will incur tenant improvement costs for the 194,000 <br /> sq.ft. of net rentable office space in the three buildings and must build out a 2,700 <br /> sq. ft. restaurant on the ground floor of Building B. Tenant improvements for the <br /> office space are estimated at 530 per sq.ft. and 3166,000 for the restaurant space. <br /> • An estimated cost of 51,100,000 to build the 39,000 sq.ft. parking deck. <br /> • • The Developer's direct construction costs also include all on -site and off -site costs, <br /> including site landscaping, the fountain/plaza and creekwalk, traffic signal and site <br /> preparation contingency allowance. Total on -site and off -site costs are estimated <br /> at S2,000,000. The Developer is obligated to construct high quality site amenities, <br /> including a prominent landscape feature at the corner of San Leandro Boulevard <br /> and Davis Street, and extensive surface parking lot landscaping on the Site. <br /> 0 g1 <br /> Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. <br /> 19096.0261002- 001.doc Page 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.