Laserfiche WebLink
C. Project Scope <br /> is it sustainable with natural hydrology and sediment transport <br /> processes? The beach might not work without high wave exposure and <br /> an ongoing source of sand. Does this limit beach location to along the <br /> Bay margin? Does this mean regular sand re- nourishment? Should the <br /> e beach be pan of a sediment- balanced option; say a channel- marsh -and- <br /> _' island complex that includes kayak "trails "? <br /> 7,11;" ' zc t <br /> $ r - How difficult will it be to secure permits? There would still be Corps <br /> amt ,rs -.,t. and BCDC permit requirements, but if we can add a wildlife <br /> w4pi • r .:1' ..,- enhancement, say tidal marsh or managing islands for breeding birds, thc <br /> permitting may be simpler and less expensive. <br /> What will it cost to implement/maintain? The revised alternative could <br /> be designed to be largely self - sustaining with natural physical processes, <br /> avoiding maintenance dredging and minimizing the need for expensive <br /> ongoing management. <br /> Does it generate revenue? A concessionaire could manage the beach and <br /> kayak rentals under City license? Could this pay for all or significantly <br /> • offset operating costs? <br /> 3. Technical and Regulatory Opportunities <br /> and Constraints <br /> . rr, ^. In ESA's 2007 Opportunities and Constraints Analysis, we note that in most <br /> ` <br /> '" ' i of the action area shared by both the Basin and the DMMS, the full weight of <br /> _�—.- <br /> _i coastal regulation comes into play and receives: protection by Section 404 of <br /> a:. t i y a the Clean Water Act under the jurisdiction of the US Army Corps of <br /> tis , .�. Engineers'(Corps), so that any disturbance would require consultation and <br /> k ;w' , F permits from the Corps, and through the Corps with thc U.S. Fish and <br /> ` = ' ) <br /> - ' e" �,. . — Wildlife Service (USFWS). In addition, the State Water Resources Control <br /> gip.. -. a <br /> rx _ Board (SWRCB) must certify that a Corps permit action meets state water <br /> r :',.- e,> — c l."'•1 quality objectives (Section 401, Clean Water Act), so consultation and <br /> permits from the RWQCB would also be necessary. Others likely involved <br /> would be the Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), <br /> State Lands Commission, Department of Fish and Game, and thc Bay Area <br /> Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). <br /> Regulatory issues are daunting, with multiple players whose missions are <br /> rarely the same for moving forward with a successful alternative. The team <br /> will look towards giving each alternative some attributes of positive water <br /> quality improvement or biological resource enhancement, so that thc final <br /> preferred alternative is self- mitigating. For example, a series of small <br /> "islands" in the Basin would be breeding bird and waterfowl loafing and <br /> refuge sites and provide a miniature archipelago for kayaks and dinghy <br /> sailors to navigate. <br /> C -2 Oty of San Leandro Harbor Basin Alternatives Study RFP 50536 <br />