Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> E. work Products and Project Budget <br /> • Recreational opportunities <br /> • Consistency with adjacent current and future land uses <br /> The team responses /memoranda will also address redevelopment options <br /> for the DMMS, although the checklist for the DMMS will be slightly <br /> different, as follows: <br /> • Permitting and regulatory opportunities: mitigation "credits" for City <br /> needs; <br /> • Cost projections; <br /> • Biological attributes to be emphasized; and <br /> • Public uses <br /> Task 3. Development of 3 Design Concepts and Final <br /> Report <br /> The Draft and Final Study Report will, in close coordination with the City, <br /> reduce the number of alternatives to 3. These will be described and illustrated <br /> in sufficient detail to be presented at public meetings. The main part of the <br /> report will be descriptive text. Each team member will provide a technical <br /> memoranda for the different checklist items. The Alternatives Technical <br /> Study Report will be finalized by the end of January 201 1, following one <br /> round of staff review of the final report. <br /> Task 4. Project Management <br /> As noted in Section B, the Project Manager will be Tom Roberts, assisted by <br /> Tania Sheyner. <br /> Tom will be primary point of contact for the project team, and will ensure the <br /> team's responsiveness to the requirements of City staff. He will also oversee <br /> the preparation of all work products, monitor project progress, ensure the <br /> technical accuracy of all deliverables, prepare selected key Alternatives <br /> Study technical sections. maintain the performance schedule, resolve any <br /> scheduling conflicts, monitor budget expenditures, coordinate meetings, and <br /> interact as necessary with City staff and other parties involved in the <br /> Alternatives Study process. <br /> 3. Preliminary Schedule <br /> The proposed project schedule is presented in Table E -1, below. ESA <br /> proposes to meet the schedule provided in the City's RFP and therefore, a <br /> performance period of approximately four months is assumed from project <br /> initiation to the submittal of the final technical report. ESA will make every <br /> • <br /> effort to consolidate specific tasks in order to move the project ahead as <br /> expeditiously as possible. <br /> E-2 Cary of San Lean&u Harbor Basin Abomattvos Study RFP 50536 <br />