My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2011 0307
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
Packet 2011 0307
>
3A Public Hearing 2011 0307
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2011 10:35:31 AM
Creation date
3/3/2011 3:56:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
3/7/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2011 0307
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 0307
MO 2011-044
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minute Orders\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ACTIVITY LOCATIONS <br /> The City is permitted to spend up to 15% of its annual CDBG entitlement grant funds, plus <br /> previous year's program income, on public services. Some of the previous public service projects <br /> the City has funded include emergency shelter services, multi- services (through a community <br /> service center), literacy programs, tenant/landlord counseling, and services for disabled <br /> households. <br /> CDBG funds can be used for four (4) general types of projects: housing, capital projects, <br /> economic development, and public services. All projects must meet at least one (1) of HUD's <br /> national objectives: 1) to benefit low /moderate - income people; 2) to prevent or eliminate slums <br /> and blight: and 3) to meet an urgent community development need. <br /> Even if a project is suitable for one of the City's eligible categories, it must also pass the low- and <br /> moderate- income benefit test. A project basically meets this standard if at least 51% of the <br /> beneficiaries have low- moderate incomes (i.e., incomes at or below 80% of Area Median Income) <br /> or if the project benefits an area (e.g., census tracts, service area, neighborhood, etc.) with a <br /> majority of low- moderate income people. Funded projects are required to document the income <br /> levels of persons and households receiving these services. <br /> "Through the City's Community Assistance Grant Program (CAP), the City of San Leandro <br /> supports community -based non - profit organizations that provide public services to San Leandro <br /> residents. There are typically two (2) sources of funds for CAP: the City's General Fund and <br /> CDBG funds. However, due to the City's current budget deficit, no General Funds will be used to <br /> fund the CAP program for FY 2011 -12. Instead, similar to last fiscal year 2010 -2011, the CAP <br /> will be funded solely with CDBG funds. The City's Request for Proposals (RFP) process occurs <br /> every two (2) years through the CAP program. <br /> Proposals submitted through the CAP process are reviewed by members of the Human Services <br /> Commission and City staff. The City's Consolidated Plan provides guidance for the City's <br /> Human Services Commission (HSC) and staff in allocating CDBG funds in the community. <br /> Because there are special CDBG eligibility and reporting requirements, City staff work closely <br /> with the HSC to determine which agencies are best suited for CDBG funds. <br /> HSC members evaluate applications using HSC and CDBG evaluation criteria. Below is a partial <br /> list of the specific criteria used to evaluate CDBG- funded applications: <br /> • Project is CDBG - eligible and meets one of the three National Objectives (stated above). <br /> • Project is consistent with the community priorities and goals stated in the Consolidated Plan <br /> and/or other City planning documents and needs assessments. <br /> • Prior experience and performance with CDBG- related activities and/or prior experience with <br /> other grant programs, and proven record carrying out service projects in the community. <br /> • Financial capacity as indicated by audited financial statements. <br /> • Adequate staffing (staff size, experience, and qualifications). <br /> • Organizational strength (e.g., record - keeping methods, financial systems, data collection). <br /> Housing Services staff have developed a separate RFP for capital improvement projects (CIP) and <br /> consider CIP proposals separately from the CAP process. However, the evaluation criteria are <br /> similar to those mentioned above. <br /> DR. AFT .action Plan - F) 2011-2012 <br /> Cirt' of San Leandro <br /> Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.