Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION 2 <br />Alternatives Considered <br />This section describes the three alternatives that are being analyzed for the San Leandro Marina <br />Harbor Basin, as well as a No Action Alternative. <br />2.1 No Action Alternative (Custodial Care Only) <br />If the City were to suspend the required periodic dredging of the Harbor Basin and Channel due to <br />lack of funding or for some other reason, over time, the basin would fill with sediments through <br />natural deposition. Within 4 to 5 years, Channel deposition would prevent access to the basin for the <br />typical boats that presently use the marina. Kayaks and other hand launched craft could continue <br />using the basin at high tides for another 4 to 5 years, at the end of which it would become difficult <br />and unadvisable to continue. The harbor would very likely become a mud flat, and will eventually <br />acquire salt marsh emergent vegetation over time starting at the periphery of the basin. <br />A complex assemblage of plants and associated wildlife could exist in the harbor basin in the long- <br />term, although Section 4.3 makes the argument that the mud flats could persist indefinitely. If the <br />site evolved more conventionally, California cordgrass would occur closest to the water and common <br />pickleweed at higher elevation, interspersed with salt grass, fleshy jaumea and alkali heath. Higher <br />marsh elevations would support species such as arrowgrass, sea lavender, and marsh plaintain. Put <br />another way, it would resemble the restored San Leandro Shoreline Marshlands to the south, with <br />its wildlife community including resident and transient ducks, herons, egrets, geese, rails, wading <br />birds such as avocets, sandpipers, gulls, terns, raptors, small mammals and upland bird species. It <br />is also noted that, in the event that no funding is available for the removal of the existing piers and <br />other structures in the Harbor Basin, they would eventually rot and the area would likely need to <br />be fenced off for safety reasons. In this case, the site could eventually become blighted. Design <br />concept for the No Action Alternative is illustrated in Figure 2-1, on the following page. <br />2.2 Alternatives Descriptions <br />To varying degrees, all alternatives would contain wildlife high -marsh refugia, islands, high <br />marshl, and low marsh areas. These wetland features would be created using the materials <br />dredged from the basin during the next one or two dredge cycles. These wetlands would provide <br />The terms high -marsh, refugia, and island are used interchangeably in this report. They are areas at or near high tide <br />elevations and provide different, and usually more diverse, vegetation and habitat for additional species, especially <br />those, such as the salt marsh harvest mouse, that seek higher ground during incoming tides. The detailed design of a <br />selected alternative would determine the final elevations. <br />San Leandro Marina Harbor Basin 2-1 ESA / 210461 <br />Alternatives Study March 2011 <br />