My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2011 0321
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
Packet 2011 0321
>
3A Public Hearing 2011 0321
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2011 5:17:21 PM
Creation date
3/17/2011 5:02:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
3/21/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2011 0321
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 0321
Reso 2011-060
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' Potentially <br /> • SlpNlkent <br /> Potentially Unless Leas than <br /> • <br /> Significant AC/gallon SIgnlfcam <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact <br /> IX. LAND USE PLANNING. Would the project: <br /> a. Physically divide an established community? LJ D UJ <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could physlcally divide an <br /> established community. • <br /> b. Conflict with any applicable lend use plan, policy, or regulation of an Q D <br /> agency with jurisdiction over the project (Including, but not limited to the <br /> general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinances) <br /> adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements and will not conflict with any land <br /> use plan, policy, or regulation that was adopted for the purpose of avoiding <br /> or mitigating an environmental effect. Any projects built pursuant to these <br /> code changes would be subject to thelr own, new Independent <br /> environmental review. These changes do not encourage development. <br /> c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community Q <br /> conservation plan? <br /> Comment: The proposed ordlnances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements and will not conflict with any habitat <br /> conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. <br /> X. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: <br /> . e. Result in the loss of avallabllity of a known mineral resource that would be 0 <br /> of value to the region and the residents of the state? <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result In any Impacts to <br /> mineral resources. <br /> b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally Important mineral resource o 0 0 <br /> recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land <br /> use plan? <br /> Comment The proposed ordlnances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result In any Impacts to <br /> mineral resources. <br /> • <br /> XI. NOISE. Would the project result in: <br /> a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels In excess of 0 0 0 m <br /> standards established In the local general plan or noise ordlnances, or <br /> applicable standards of other agencies <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result In any now <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result in any noise <br /> Impacts. <br /> • b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration 0 ❑ m <br /> or groundbome noise levels? <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result in any noise <br /> Impacts. <br /> c. A ; substantial permanent Increase in ambient noise levels In the project ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 <br /> vicinity above levels existing without the project? <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result In any noise <br /> Impacts. <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.