My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2011 0321
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
Packet 2011 0321
>
3A Public Hearing 2011 0321
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2011 5:17:21 PM
Creation date
3/17/2011 5:02:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
3/21/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2011 0321
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 0321
Reso 2011-060
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Potentially <br /> Significant <br /> • Potentially Unless Less than <br /> Significant Mglgatlon Significant <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact <br /> d. A substantial temporary or periodic Increase In ambient noise levels In the ❑ 0 <br /> • project vicinity above levels existing without the protect? <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new • <br /> • construction or physical improvements that could result In any noise <br /> Impacts. <br /> e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan ❑ ❑ <br /> has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use <br /> airport, would the project expose people residing or working In the protect <br /> area to excessive noise levels? <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that would be subject to airport <br /> noise. <br /> 1. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the protect ❑ 0 ❑ 21 <br /> expose people residing or working In the protect area to excessive noise <br /> levels? (n/a) <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that would be subject to airport <br /> noise. <br /> XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: <br /> a. Induce substantial population growth In an area either directly (for 1J LJ 21 <br /> example, by proposing new homes and businesses or Indirectly (for <br /> example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (1,3) • <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result In a substantial <br /> growth In population. <br /> b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the fl Q <br /> construction of replacement housing elsewhere? <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result In any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result In any Impacts to <br /> population and housing. <br /> c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of 0 LJ <br /> replacement housing elsewhere? <br /> Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br /> construction or physical Improvements that could result In any Impacts to <br /> population and housing. • <br /> XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES. <br /> a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical Impacts <br /> associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental <br /> facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the <br /> construction of which could cause significant environmental Impacts, In <br /> order to maintain acceptable service ratlos, response times or other <br /> performance objectives for any of the public services: <br /> Fire protection? ❑ O ❑ 0 <br /> Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 <br /> Schools? ❑ o . o 21 <br /> Parks? 0 0 Q <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.