Laserfiche WebLink
d) Adoption of the proposed consistency amendments would not have an impact on water supplies. Water supply needs <br /> were previously addressed in the General Plan EIR and the TOD Strategy EIR. The consistency amendments do not <br /> propose any increases to the development quantity analyzed in the TOD EIR. Future development projects would be <br /> subject to environmental review, which would include an assessment of water supply needs and accompanying <br /> measures to meet those needs and implement conservation measures. <br /> e) Adoption of the proposed consistency amendments would not require a determination by the wastewater treatment <br /> provider regarding capacity since the action does not propose any increase in the city's development capacity. <br /> Wastewater capacity needs were evaluated in the TOD EIR and impacts were determined to be less than significant. <br /> Any future development would be subject to environmental review, including a determination that the respective <br /> wastewater plants have sufficient capacity to handle sanitary sewer flows. <br /> f) Adoption of the General Plan consistency amendments will have no impact on solid waste disposal needs. <br /> Development impacts on waste disposal were previously assessed in the General Plan ER and the TOD Strategy EIR. <br /> The quantity of development accommodated by the proposed amendments is consistent with the amount evaluated in <br /> the TOD ER. <br /> g) The General Plan consistency amendments would be fully compliant with federal, state, and local statues/ regulations <br /> related to solid waste. The amendments do not affect General Plan solid waste policies. <br /> h) The General Plan consistency amendments would be fully compliant with federal, state, and local statutes and <br /> regulations related to stormwater discharge. The amendments do not affect General Plan stormwater policies. <br /> POTENTIALLY <br /> POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS THAN <br /> NO <br /> ISSUES SIGNIFICANT UNLESS SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SOURCES <br /> ISSUES MITIGATION IMPACT <br /> INCORPORATED <br /> "_ a i t k - a�. r. *Ig tig <br /> e133REGREATIO\_+ � j s. +��`5 C�� - >t �������� I ,,;r -�!� r, -ru t u {;'"' ��,; <br /> � .�e '� _ W''lF�i��ll+ S 3 I �/� ` `I7� St� / _. LJ �.'r e <br /> a. Would the project increase the use of existing X 1 ,2 <br /> neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational <br /> facilities such that substantial physical deterioration <br /> of the facility would occur or be accelerated? <br /> b. Does the project include recreational facilities or X 1,2 <br /> require the construction or expansion of recreational <br /> facilities which might have an adverse physical effect <br /> on the environment? <br /> EXPLANATION: <br /> a) The General Plan consistency amendments would not increase the use of neighborhood or regional parks, or lead to the <br /> deterioration of these facilities through overuse. The growth facilitated by the amendments has already been accounted <br /> for and analyzed in the EIRs for the General Plan and TOD Strategy. The amendments would not increase development <br /> beyond the forecasts included in those documents, and would not increase impacts on park facilities or recreational <br /> services beyond the levels already evaluated. <br /> b) The TOD Strategy proposed a number of park and recreational improvements, all of which are consistent with the goals <br /> and policies of the General Plan. The impacts of these proposals were evaluated in the TOD Strategy ER and were <br /> determined to have a less than significant impact. No additional impacts would occur as a result of amending the <br /> General Plan to be consistent with the previously approved TOD Strategy. <br /> TOD and Housing Element General Plan Consistency Amendments • January 2011 • Page 22 <br />