Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> POTENTIALLY <br /> POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS TITAN <br /> NO <br /> SIGNIFICANT UNLESS SIGNIFICANT SOURCES <br /> ISSUES IMPACT <br /> ISSUES MITIGATION IMPACT <br /> INCORPORATED <br /> L15TCULTIOURCEStWOiId Wi 4,{71; <br /> a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance X 1,2 <br /> of a historical resource as defined in section 15064.5? <br /> b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance X 1,2 <br /> of an archaeological resource pursuant to section <br /> 15064.5? <br /> c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique X 1,2 <br /> paleontological resource or site or unique geologic <br /> feature? <br /> d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred X <br /> outside of formal cemeteries? <br /> EXPLANATION: <br /> a) The General Plan consistency amendments would have no impact on historical resources in San Leandro. The <br /> impact of new land use designations on historic resources was previously analyzed in the TOD Strategy EIR and was <br /> found to be less than significant. The extent of the impacts documented in the SIR would not be changed as a result <br /> of the proposed amendments and General Plan Map changes. The General Plan includes policies to protect historic <br /> sites and structures, and none of these policies will be modified by the proposed amendments. <br /> b) Adoption of the consistency amendments would not affect archaeological resources. The geographic extent of these <br /> resources was documented in the previously certified General Plan EIR and the TOD Strategy EIR and mitigation <br /> measures have already been prescribed. Impacts were determined to be less than significant due to General Plan <br /> policies addressing protection of such resources. These policies will not be changed through this amendment. <br /> c) Adoption of the consistency amendments would not affect paleontological resources or unique geologic features. <br /> This was identified as a less than significant impact in the General Plan EIR and the TOD Strategy EIR and nothing <br /> in the proposed amendments would change that finding. <br /> d) The potential for disturbance to human remains was considered in the TOD Strategy EIR and was determined to be a <br /> less than significant impact. No impacts above and beyond those assessed in that SIR would occur as a result of <br /> amending the General Plan to be consistent with the TOD Strategy. <br /> POTENTIALLY <br /> POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS THAN <br /> NO <br /> SIGNIFICANT UNLESS SIGNIFICANT SOURCES <br /> ISSUES IMPACT <br /> ISSUES MITIGATION IMPACT <br /> INCORPORATED <br /> a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or X 1,2,3 <br /> Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as <br /> shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland <br /> Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California <br /> • <br /> Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? <br /> b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X 1,2,4 <br /> Williamson Act contract? <br /> c. Involve other changes in the existing environment X 1,2 <br /> which, due to their location or nature, could result in <br /> conversion of farmland, to non-agricultural use? <br /> TOD and Housing Element General Plan Consistency Amendments January 2011 • Page 24 <br />