My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8J Consent 2011 0404
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
Packet 2011 0404
>
8J Consent 2011 0404
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2011 10:43:29 AM
Creation date
3/31/2011 5:12:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
4/4/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2011 0404
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 0404
Reso 2011-069
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LSA ASSOCIATES. INC. CEQA INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEOATIVE DECLARATION <br /> MARCH 2011 PREDA STREET PIPE BRIDGES UPGRADE <br /> SAN LEANDRO. CALIFORNIA <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially with Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> XI. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: <br /> a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource 0 0 0 <br /> that would be of value to the region and the residents of the <br /> State? <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important ❑ L • <br /> mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general <br /> plan, specific plan or other land use plan? <br /> Affected Environment: <br /> The project site is not underlain by geologic material that is considered a mineral resource of value to <br /> the region or residents of California nor has it been designated as a mineral resource recovery site. <br /> Discussion: <br /> a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region <br /> and the residents of the State? <br /> No Impact. No known mineral resources are present at the project site. Therefore, <br /> implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a known <br /> mineral resource. <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site delineated <br /> on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? <br /> No Impact. The project site has not been designated as a locally- important mineral resources <br /> recovery site. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of <br /> availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general <br /> plan, specific plan or other land use plan. <br /> P:1EG1080110EQA\Preda_FINAL_IS- MND.doc (03/18111) 43 <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.