My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes 2011 0404
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
Minutes 2011 0404
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2011 12:51:33 PM
Creation date
4/22/2011 12:51:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minutes
Document Date (6)
4/4/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
8B Consent 2011 0418
(Superseded by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 0418
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES Page 10 <br /> City of San Leandro City Council and San Leandro Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting — April 4, 2011 <br /> impede the cameras. Lieutenant Lemmon commented that Redflex had reduced fees in <br /> the past when a camera was out of service. He explained that the City could renegotiate <br /> at the end of 48 months and terminate the contract at the end of 60 months if the cost is <br /> not longer feasible. <br /> Councilmember Prola expressed that the length of the contract seems excessive and <br /> requested a cap on the CPI (Consumer Price Index) for pricing increases. M.r. Uhler <br /> confirmed that Redflex would accept a cap, after discussions and negotiations. <br /> Councilmember Prola asked how the cap would be incorporated into the contract. <br /> City Attorney Jayne Williams explained that the City Council can approve the contract <br /> subject to the negotiation of a reasonable cap. The City Manager or staff could approve <br /> the terms, without having to bring the agreement back to the City Council. <br /> Mr. Uhler added that Redflex could also include language on long -term construction <br /> issues for suspending the terms of an approach. <br /> Councilmember Prola asked Mr. Uhler if Redflex has ever included a percentage of the <br /> revenue. Mr. Uhler answered that the state disallows this practice, and that all the red <br /> light camera contracts are based on a flat fee. <br /> Councilmember Gregory asked about the contract extension in December and expressed <br /> concern about the length of the contract and the CPI. He also inquired if the contract <br /> had gone out to bid. City Manager Hollister commented that negotiation was delayed <br /> due to the transition of police chiefs. Lieutenant Lenunon reported that an officer <br /> evaluated another system, but the features were not as suitable for the City. City <br /> Manager Hollister commented that the Police Department evaluated Redflex and <br /> another system in 2005, prior to awarding the sole source contract to Redflex. <br /> Councilmember Starosciak asked if the cameras were in operation during the <br /> constructions on Washington Street and Lewelling Boulevard, and if the constructions <br /> had impacts on the number of violations. Lieutenant Lemmon reported that the cameras <br /> were in operation during the majority of the constructions. <br /> Councilmember Starosciak expressed support of not running the cameras during <br /> constructions, and inquired if the equipment could be kept at the Lewelling/Washington <br /> approach. She also inquired about the impact for implementing a shorter contract. Mr. <br /> Uhler commented that Redflex could keep the infrastructure in place and explained the <br /> contract terms. <br /> Vice Mayor Reed asked about the criteria used for dismissing violations and about the <br /> camera mechanism. Officer Gary Wong explained that each violation is reviewed on a <br /> case -by -case basis and provided examples. Mr. Uhler explained how the roadway <br /> sensors work. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.