My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8I Consent 2011 0620
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
Packet 2011 0620
>
8I Consent 2011 0620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2011 5:15:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2011 4:27:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
6/20/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2011 0620
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 0620
Reso 2011-112
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
New Contract for Audit Services <br />Criteria Used for Selection <br />The City received eight proposals for evaluation and conducted telephone interviews with <br />each firm. Finance staff members conducted panel interviews with the top four firms. <br />Criteria used in the selection process included the following; <br />• Established public sector experience with cities comparable to San Leandro. This <br />includes guidance and recommendations with the latest GASB pronouncements <br />such as GASB 54 - Fund Balance Components, Enterprise Fund and <br />Redevelopment Agency Reporting and knowledge of compliance issues (e.g. <br />grants); <br />• Ability to provide performance and internal control recommendations; <br />• Ability to provide post audit consulting services; <br />• Active involvement with policy board updates and /or professional associations; <br />• Effective planning skills before the audit, effective communication during the <br />audit and the ability to work with City staff, <br />• Level of senior partner /management involvement during the audit; and <br />• Competitive pricing and overall service quality, etc. <br />Summary of Findings <br />Final interviews included the following firms: Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co.; Galina LLP; <br />JJACPA, Inc.; and Maze and Associates. <br />Staff recommends Maze and Associates. In addition to their extensive auditing and <br />consulting experience with municipalities and other non - profits, the Maze and Associates <br />practice also includes broad private sector experience in industries such as banking and <br />commercial enterprises. The City desires a firm with both municipal and private sector <br />experience. A firm with a high level of municipal experience will ensure that the auditors <br />are current with municipal best practices and the latest Government Accounting <br />Standards Board Pronouncements (GASB Policies). <br />Maze and Associates has experience with numerous government agencies, including <br />comparable cities such as the City of Palo Alto, the City of Alameda and the City of <br />Livermore. These cities are similar in that they have enterprise funds, qualify for a single <br />audit, are audited for grant compliance, and maintain redevelopment agencies. In <br />addition, Maze and Associates offers other services such as fraud investigation, fee and <br />user studies, performance audits, revenue enhancement assistance, and debt financing <br />analysis. Maze and Associates' pricing was competitive and is proposed at $55,910 for <br />the fiscal year ending 2010 -11, $56,748 and $57,599 for the fiscal years ending 2011 -12 <br />and 2012 -13, respectively <br />Budget Authority 010 -12- 052 -5120 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.