My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8K Consent 2011 0620
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
Packet 2011 0620
>
8K Consent 2011 0620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2011 5:15:38 PM
Creation date
6/16/2011 4:30:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
6/20/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2011 0620
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 0620
Reso 2011-114
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Alameda CTC Paratransit Program Application Page 6 of 12 <br />Application Period July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012 <br />17A. Has this plan been reviewed by a local paratransit advisory committee? <br />❑✓ Yes <br />❑ No <br />17B. If yes, list the committee name and date of the meeting. <br />Senior Commission - March 17, 2011. The application was not completed, but the planned service <br />17C. Describe any surveys or analysis conducted and staff reports. (max. 255 characters) <br />In Feb. 2011 we conducted the annual survey, held two workshops and met with the paratransit <br />advisory body. Since we made significant changes last year, our goal was to get input on the <br />revamped service and identify any needed "tweaks" to the service. <br />17D. Describe how the planning process is connected to the service plan: How do the planned <br />services correspond to the results of the planning process? (max. 255 characters) <br />There are no service changes planned for 2011 -12. Even with the significant changes that were <br />implemented in 2010 -11, riders indicated that they are satisfied. 73% of the respondents rated the <br />service Fair - Good. (2% Poor, 25% Don't Know) <br />18. If proposing service changes, what identified needs or priorities will the proposed changes <br />meet? What needs or priorities will the proposed service changes still not meet? <br />(max. 500 characters) <br />tiers would like the Shuttle to operate later than 3 pm. We plan to expand the operating hours <br />ould funds become available. <br />ased on Central County Mobility Workshop input, CTC staff is considering expansion of the South <br />ounty gap funded taxi voucher program into Central County. We included questions about taxi <br />wchers in our survey. 42% of survey respondents said that they need same day transportation. <br />5% said that they would use a taxi voucher service if it wa available. <br />19. Describe how you will measure customer satisfaction, for example, by participating in a <br />countywide rider survey, tracking customer comments, or other means? <br />(max. 255 characters) <br />Surveys, Customer Comment Cards, Complaint Log, Feedback gathered through workshops and <br />other outreach efforts, Volunteer "Secret" Rider <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.