Airport Highlights 2005 0203 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

• • • Aviation Committee • January 13, 2005 • Master Plan Progress Report Page 8 . • Area 4 is the redevelopment of existing general aviation facilities. Appropriate planning considerations are listed for each area. Port staff and the Stakeholder Advisory Committee representatives discussed the various development areas at the December 2004. meeting. Several Committee members suggested some. additional planning considerations, which were added to the graphic. However, the Committee did not discuss a preferred altemative land -use area for general. aviation activity. This topic will be agendized for discussion at a future Stakeholder Advisory Committee meeting. • Next Steps Port staff plans to use the forecast number of operations for future master plan tasks, such as simulating airfield operations to determine runway and taxiway capacity, delay, and congestion. The potential development areas and planning considerations will be used to formulate land -use plans and master plan documentation. Master Plan Administration • The master plan project is part of the Port's Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and all work • has been and will be charged to appropriate CIP element and work order numbers. The following table presents a snapshot of the budget for the master plan: Original Resource Budget Brief Status • Graphics/Report Production $75,000 Board approved contract for $75,000 with Finger Design Associates (Resolution No. 04117); Board approved supplemental contract with Finger Design Associates (Resolution No. 04304) to acid $70,000 to the original contract, for a total of $145,000; approx. S71,500 spent CAD Services/Engineering $30,000 Approx. $14,700 spent (in- house /Engineering Division Division Support staff costs) Administrative Support $30,000 Contract with Outsource Consulting Services, Inc.; approx. $4,300 spent • Printing $35,000 Port staff is doing most of the printing in -house (e.g., meeting handouts); approx. $4,000 spent Legal Services $30,000 Approx. $10,300 spent • Aircraft Noise Consulting $150,000 Board approved contract for $150,000 with Mestre • Greve Associates (Resolution No. 04076); approx. $10,000 spent Airfield Simulation Consulting f $100,000 Board approved contract for $100,000 with ATAC Corporation (Resolution No. 04118); approx. $11,000 spent, plus an additional $81,000 committed (work -in- . • progress. in preparation for March 3, 2005, Stakeholder Advisory Committee meeting) • As shown in the status for each resource, the overall master plan is still well under the proposed . budget (approximately. 46% spent, compared to the originally authorized budget for the master plan, excluding the recent Board authorization for additional graphics services), whereas Port •