Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Sheila Young • • <br /> July 15, 2004 <br /> Page 2 of 9 <br /> more likely than other potential operating scenarios— but was analyzed in the <br /> 1996/97 EIR in order to identify potential effects if such a scenario were to occur. <br /> The area of San Leandro closest to the Airport, which is located directly <br /> underneath the "straight in" arrival patterns to 27L, is an industrial area, whereas <br /> the "straight in" arrival pattern to 27R goes over the residential area of Timothy <br /> • <br /> Drive and adjacent to homes in Davis West. To decrease the noise from the <br /> B737 arrivals in those residential areas under the worst case scenario studied in <br /> the 1996/97 EIR if such a scenario were to occur, the EIR suggested taking <br /> action to make it more likely that those aircraft landed on Runway 27L instead of <br /> 27R, which would move the associated noise contour towards the industrial area. <br /> Operationally, this also is the preferred North Field runway for large aircraft as <br /> 27L is approximately 700 feet longer than 27R and larger aircraft prefer landing <br /> on the longer runway. Runways 27R and 27L are only 1000 feet apart; therefore, <br /> flights could still be seen, but noise would be decreased somewhat. <br /> 2) Table S -3 of the 2003 Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, <br /> Airport Development Program, in a Summary of Significant Impacts and <br /> Mitigation Measures for the Airport Development Program, lists as its first item <br /> "Aircraft noise impacts to residential areas of the Cities of Alameda and San <br /> Leandro in 2010." The listed Mitigation Adopted by Port states: <br /> Noise insulation; redirect commercial passenger jet aircraft to Runway 27L; and <br /> continue current noise abatement policies. <br /> Answer: Table S -3 carries over all mitigation measures identified in the 1996/97 <br /> EIR and approved by the Port when it approved the ADP in 1997. Please note <br /> that under the column heading "Increase in Severity," the response is not only <br /> "no" but that the severity is "reduced" — meaning that it is less than was stated in <br /> the 1996/97 EIR. The noise insulation refers to continuing the residential sound <br /> insulation program on Bay Farm Island, which will ensure the homes are <br /> compatible with state and federal guidelines. (This program follows state and <br /> federal eligibility criteria for insulation, which includes homes located within the <br /> 65 decibel CNEL contour. No San Leandro homes fall within the 65 dB contour.) <br /> The table also reassures the community that the Airport will continue its existing <br /> noise abatement procedures. <br /> The issue of "redirecting commercial jet aircraft arrivals to 27L" also is addressed <br /> on Page 3 -29 of the 2003 SEIR's Response to Comments for the Supplemental <br /> Environmental Impact Report (SEIR). It explains here that the scenario <br /> described in the 1996/97 EIR where some pilots of arriving B737 might choose <br /> to land on Runway 27L is no longer considered likely to occur. One reason is <br /> that based upon detailed analysis of aircraft fleets and load factors, the number <br /> of projected future aircraft operations was decreased in the 2003 SEIR as <br />