My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8M Consent 2011 0906
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
Packet 2011 0906
>
8M Consent 2011 0906
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2011 11:56:24 AM
Creation date
8/30/2011 3:26:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
9/6/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2011 0906
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 0906
Reso 2011-159
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Connection Fee Recommendations <br />u <br />u <br />I <br />J <br />J <br />J <br />n <br />0 <br />I <br />It is recommended that the City maintain the current single - <br />family residential connection fee of $950 for fiscal years <br />1997/98 and 1998/99. Based on the marginal cost - pricing analysis <br />at reproduction cost new discussed previously, it is estimated <br />that an average connection fee of $968 inclusive of contingencies <br />at ten percent per equivalent single - family dwelling unit will <br />derive costs of system expansion over fiscal years 1997/98 and <br />1998/99. No further consideration should be given to the system <br />buy -in connection fee of $456 because it will not recover the <br />incremental costs of future system expansion. <br />It is further recommended that the City consider <br />implementing a connection fee based on value of service <br />considerations. The City's current connection fee is based on <br />the current cost of duplicating the existing facilities. <br />However, this cost is likely to approximate the average costs of <br />several expansions with each expansion costing more or less than <br />this average cost. Because the City has not needed to expand its <br />wastewater management facilities, detailed engineering studies <br />have not been conducted for the next expansion phase and thus <br />exact costs of any such expansion are not known. If connection <br />fee revenues are not adequate for the next expansion phase, some <br />form of debt would need to be issued, such as another General <br />Fund loan. <br />If the City desires to fund expansions on a pay -as- you -go <br />basis without any debt, then the City should consider <br />implementing a higher connection fee based on the value of <br />service provided. As previously discussed, this method until <br />recently has probably the most frequently employed method of <br />developing connection fees for wastewater utilities. With <br />today's ever - increasing costs of system expansion, these <br />additional revenues provide a safeguard to existing system users <br />in that it is less likely that they will be burdened with costs <br />of expansion caused by area growth. Because of legislation (AB <br />1600), however, the City should identify likely expansion <br />projects and tie any higher fee to those projects before <br />considering implementing a fee higher than previously <br />recommended. <br />Based on the practices of other California wastewater <br />utilities, a City connection fee of $2,200 appears reasonable. <br />Note that though a connection fee of $2,200 approximates the <br />average of 755 California communities, high growth communities <br />with current expansion projects usually have connection fees of <br />over $3,000. Because these higher connection fees are usually <br />based on current known expansion costs as compared to historical <br />costs, current replacement costs, or connection fees of other <br />communities, these higher connection fees are more likely to be <br />representative of new expansion costs. A City connection fee of <br />$2,200 ought to be quite reasonable for the service provided <br />84 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.