Laserfiche WebLink
Medical Marijuana Moratorium 3 September 6, 2011 <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Report Per California Government Code section 65858(d) <br /> Government Code section 65858(d) requires a written report describing the measures taken to <br /> alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the ordinance. This Staff Report explains the <br /> City's activities and measures taken for the period since November 15 2010, when the urgency <br /> ordinance was extended by 10 months and 15 days to September 30, 2011. <br /> City staff from the Police Department, City Attorney's Office and Community Development <br /> Department reviewed material from other cities and counties in California with respect to their <br /> laws regulating medical marijuana dispensaries and cultivation facilities, including, but not <br /> limited to, Alameda, Albany, Berkeley, Dublin, Emeryville, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore, <br /> Newark, Oakland, Piedmont, Pleasanton, Union City, Sebastopol, Santa Cruz, Santa Barbara, <br /> South San Francisco, Redding, Rocklin, Shasta Lake, San Diego, Alameda County, Modoc <br /> County, and Tehama County. Staff also reviewed recent newspaper articles and other literature, <br /> including the White Paper on Marijuana Dispensaries by the California Police Chiefs <br /> Association's Task Force on Marijuana Dispensaries, Attorney General's Guidelines for the <br /> Security and Aron- Diversion of Marijuana Grown for Medical Use (August 2008), American <br /> Planning Association Planning Magazine (May /June 2010), HCED (Housing, Community and <br /> Economic Development) Listsery regarding medical marijuana dispensaries and cultivation, as <br /> well as information from the U.S. Attorney General's office and Alameda County District <br /> Attorney's Office. <br /> On November 8, 2010, the City Council held a work session to review legal issues related to <br /> medical marijuana dispensaries and cultivation facilities, including the Qualified Patients <br /> Association v. City of Anaheim (2010) case (Case No. G040077). At the February 28, 2011 City <br /> Council work session, staff presented information to the City Council for review and <br /> consideration. On February 28, 2011, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance <br /> prohibiting land uses related to Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and Cultivation Facilities. Staff <br /> prepared the ordinance and attachments for the May 16, 2011 City Council meeting. At the May <br /> 16, 2011 City Council meeting, the City Council expressed a desire to continue to gather <br /> additional information from other municipalities regarding their Medical Marijuana ordinances <br /> relative to cultivation facilities. The City Council noted that key information regarding <br /> cultivation facilities was still in a state of flux. <br /> Staff continues to research, and gather information related to the regulation of marijuana <br /> cultivation facilities. The moratorium is necessary to allow City staff to disseminate the <br /> information, analyze it, formulate a recommendation, and present to the City Council for their <br /> review and further direction. <br /> • <br /> Current Citv Council Policy <br /> Not applicable <br /> Previous Citv Council Action(s) <br /> The City Council adopted an interim urgency ordinance and moratorium on Medical Marijuana <br /> Dispensaries in late 2004 and early 2005. At the conclusion of the moratorium, the City took no <br /> further action to amend its Zoning Code to address marijuana dispensaries, or cultivation <br /> facilities. <br />