Laserfiche WebLink
PART III: EVALUATION OF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE <br />The purpose of this section is to assess the City's progress in meeting the priority needs and <br />specific objectives identified in the FY 2010-2011 Action Plan. <br />San Leandro completed the first year of its FY 2010-2014 HUD Consolidated Plan. The need to <br />increase affordable housing, both rental and for sale, is one of the main goals of both the <br />Housing Element of the City's General Plan and the Consolidated Plan (Con Plan). <br />1) Relationship of the Use of CDBG Funds to Priorities Needs Go `t ecific Objectives. <br />All CDBG funds were used to help the CDBG Program meet its onal objectives of providing <br />a suitable living environment, decent housing, and economic,.. °, rties to benefit low- and <br />44 <br />IJ <br />moderate -income persons. Exhibit A (page 33) compares e <br />Cityv,, aticipated housing and <br />community development goals and actual outcomes for ftp year 2010 * <br />From July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011, the CarovidedCDBG <br />-funde .1 lrc services to <br />16,177 low-income persons in need. Fifteen pr (15%) f CDBG funde allocated <br />towards public services for six (6) subrecipients who pt���iedu p- :.4 ,1 <br />rt services to.677 persons <br />in need from July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011. Davis t Family Resource Center received <br />separate CDBG funding for two (2) ot't programs: Bast,eeds Programs and Community <br />Counseling Program. ECHO Housing h e (3) of its proms funded with CDBG funds: <br />Tenant/Landlord Counseling, Rental AAM" Program, anitiir Housing Counseling. <br />However, the City funded fair housing undethe Clcneral Ammistration category. <br />Additionally, as previously abed Ba A Commurt Services BACS expended the <br />y ( ) P <br />capital improvementerean funds fot��ihe ADA accessibility rehabilitation of its crisis <br />ct ( f <br />center Woodroe Ply, =the Crtyrthermore, bWan „using CDBG funds to repay the Section <br />I OR Loan ;t nti iz to C to th onstruction ofd new senior center. <br />y <br />2) ChangejpP ect <br />During program dere ,o changes to the program objectives, and no amendments <br />were to the Annual on Pla <br />2 <br />3) Assesstii f Efforts in ing'0ut Planned Actions <br />Overall, the met oreeded all of its housing and community development goals in its <br />FY 2010-2011 ��Action�an. The notable accomplishments with CDBG and HOME funds <br />as well as Red evefo end Set -Aside funds are described above in the earlier sections of this <br />document. See also the Summary of accomplishments in Exhibit A of the Appendix. The City <br />did not hinder Consolated Plan implementation by action or willful inaction. <br />4) Funds Used for National Objectives <br />All of the CDBG funds were used for activities benefiting very low-, and low-income persons. <br />Most of the funds were used for two (2) of CDBG's national objectives: provide a suitable <br />living environment and decent housing. The City also used Redevelopment Set -Aside funds to <br />preserve and improve housing stock through its Housing Rehabilitation Program and to assist <br />eligible homebuyers under the First Time Homebuyer Program. <br />DRAFT Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report: FY 2010-2011 <br />City of San Leandro <br />Page 30 <br />