My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8D Consent 2011 0919
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
Packet 2011 0919
>
8D Consent 2011 0919
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2011 5:14:40 PM
Creation date
9/13/2011 5:40:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
9/19/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2011 0919
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 0919
Reso 2011-166
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Authorizing Pension Obligation Bonds <br />DISCUSSION <br />September 19, 2011 <br />Effective June 30, 2004, Ca1PERS created risk pools by pooling assets and liabilities across <br />groups of employers to produce large risk sharing pools intended to dramatically reduce or <br />eliminate large fluctuations in employers' contribution rates caused by unexpected demographic <br />events. Ca1PERS combined the retirement plans for all public agencies with less than 100 active <br />members to reduce the volatility of employer contribution rates. CalPERS also created for each <br />member a side fund to amortize each agency's June 30, 2003 unfunded liability over a fixed term <br />at a fixed interest rate. A negative side fund, like San Leandro's Safety Plan, causes the required <br />employer contribution rate to be increased by the amortization of the side fund. <br />The safety side fund is distinct from the City's other Ca1PERS plans and liabilities. Side funds <br />are retired over a fixed term with a fixed amortization schedule based on Ca1PERS' actuarial <br />earnings assumption rate (7.75 %). The City's plan has the side fund scheduled to be fully <br />amortized by June 30, 2024. The City's actuary has estimated the outstanding side fund balance <br />at $24.4 million as of June 30, 2011. <br />For pension obligation bonds to provide the City cost savings, the interest rate, including the cost <br />of issuance, must be significantly less than the interest rate Ca1PERS charges to amortize the side <br />fund. These bonds are not tax exempt under Federal regulations. Therefore, the taxable bonds <br />must be placed at a rate significantly less than the 7.75% charged by Ca1PERS to realize savings. <br />The 13 -year amortization period for the City's side fund frames the savings opportunity being <br />considered. U.S. Treasury yields continue to be low because of the ongoing national and global <br />economic turmoil and uncertainty. In just the past two months, rates have dropped significantly <br />lower. The City's underwriter estimates that the City's pension obligation bonds could be sold at <br />an all -in interest rate, including the cost of issuance, of around 4.61 %. This results in a potential <br />reduction of over 3.0% in the interest rate paid by the City, a potential General Fund savings of <br />approximately $480,000 annually through 2024. <br />Validation Proceedings <br />The issuance of the pension obligation bonds requires a validation proceeding in the Alameda <br />County Superior Court. To commence the validation, the City Council provides the <br />authorization by approval of the resolution for issuance of the bonds and filing of the validation <br />and then Bond Counsel files the necessary court action. The process is a public notice of the <br />City's intent to issue bonds to refinance existing pension - related debt. At best, the process <br />would proceed with no public challenges, and the validation would be ratified by the Court <br />within about 120 days of the filing. <br />Since the bonds are payable from all legally available funds of the City, validation is necessary <br />to affirm Bond Counsel's position that the bonds are exempt from the Constitutional Debt Limit <br />because the bonds are issued to refund a pre- existing obligation imposed by law for vested <br />pension benefits. Once the validation has been completed, the bond issue will be returned to the <br />City Council for final authorization. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.