My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3B Public Hearing 2011 1121
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
Packet 2011 1121
>
3B Public Hearing 2011 1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2011 2:12:41 PM
Creation date
11/15/2011 5:31:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
11/21/2011
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2011 1121
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 1121
8F Consent 2011 1205
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2011\Packet 2011 1205
Reso 2011-193
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. The school district impact fee is currently $3.54 per square foot. Song Chin - Bendib, Assistant <br />Superintendent for the San Leandro Unified School District, indicated to staff that she estimated that <br />the project would generate 26 students, but that she was doubtful that it would reach that number, due <br />to the apartment unit sizes in the proposal. Community Development Director Sims said that California <br />sets the maximum fee that jurisdictions can charge. <br />Commissioner Crow said that he would be interested in seeing the CC &Rs, particularly as they address <br />usage of the community building. He would like to know its capacity limit, whether insurance is required <br />for tenants to use it, and who is allowed to use it. Senior Planner Barros said that rights to use the space <br />extend only to the building owners and tenants, but that the applicant could respond more completely. <br />In response to another Commissioner Crow question, Planning & Housing Manager Liao said that the <br />units in the proposed development aren't reflected in Sustainable Communities Strategy numbers, nor is <br />the location within any of San Leandro's designated Priority Development Areas (PDAs). However, he <br />added, once the units are built, they'll be added to the City's accomplishments toward its Regional <br />Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) targets. <br />Commissioner Crow also noted that although developers typically do landscaping last in a project, one <br />of the Recommended Conditions of Approval states that paving and planting shall be done as soon as <br />possible. Senior Planner Barros said that contractors are asked to pave and plant immediately to minimize <br />fugitive dust from the site, but the timing is discretionary. <br />Commissioner Fitzsimons observed that in terms of publishing notifications about meetings, the <br />Hayward Daily Review isn't a ubiquitous paper in San Leandro. In the future, he asked if the City could <br />consider using the San Leandro Times as well. <br />In response to Commissioner Fitzsimons' inquiry about Recommend Conditions of Approval V -E, <br />Senior Planner Barros explained that the credit for the existing 43,200 square feet of office space offsets <br />the Development Fee for Street Improvements (DFSI), eliminating the applicant's requirement to pay that <br />fee because at capacity, the proposed residential development would create fewer vehicle trips than the <br />office building at capacity. <br />Commissioner Fitzsimons referred to Section 2.10 of the Development Agreement regarding any condo <br />conversion activity "during the term of this agreement ". Assistant City Attorney Pio Roda responded that <br />any subsequent proposal for a conversion to a condominium would have to come back to the Planning <br />Commission for approval. <br />When Commissioner Fitzsimons asked whether it would be appropriate to do a condominium map that <br />included unit, rather than building, subdivisions, Senior Planner Barros said that's not what the developer <br />wants and it's not something the City can impose. Commissioner Fitzsimons pointed out that since this is <br />an estate - planning mechanism, the buildings would go to as many as 12 family members. At some point, <br />he added, any of the individual owners may want or need to liquidate the investment, thus potentially <br />bringing in multiple non - family owners over time. Senior Planner Barros replied that POA bylaws and the <br />CC &Rs would govern the interrelationship among owners. <br />Indicating his doubts about whether CC &Rs would address an individual owner's ability to sell a building <br />or convert it into condominiums, and noting that part of the Planning Commission's role is to make <br />recommendations to the City Council that take into account how projects are likely to affect the City's <br />future, Commissioner Fitzsimons again asked if it wouldn't make sense now to approve a condominium <br />map for 66 units rather than 12. Community Development Director Sims suggested that the developer <br />might be able to answer that question. He also noted that staff has discussed the condominium conversion <br />issue and agreed that San Leandro's ordinance affecting condominium conversions is very strong. <br />In response to questions from Commissioner Rennie, Senior Planner Barros said that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.