My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2011-192
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2011
>
Reso 2011-192
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2011 12:15:40 PM
Creation date
11/30/2011 12:05:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
11/21/2011
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2450 Washington Avenue Apartments 16 October 2011 <br />POTENTIALLY <br />POTENTIALLY <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />LESS THAN <br />NO <br />ISSUES <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />UNLESS <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />IMPACT <br />SOURCES <br />ISSUES <br />MITIGATION <br />IMPACT <br />INCORPORATED <br />- <br />- <br />a. Physically divide an established community? <br />X <br />1, 2, 3 <br />b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or <br />X <br />2, 3, 4 <br />regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the <br />project (including, but not limited to the general plan, <br />specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br />ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br />mitigating an environmental effect? <br />C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan <br />X <br />2, 3, 4 <br />or natural community conservation plan? <br />EXPLANATION: <br />a) The 2.85 -acre project site is located near the intersection of San Leandro Boulevard and Washington Avenue in San <br />-----Leandroo and - is -identified - as - 2450 - Washington Avenue - (APN #07713- 1410 = 025 =00 and - 077D= 0556=104). The <br />has been previously graded and disturbed and is presently developed with a 43,200 square -foot two -story commercial <br />office building and associated asphalt parking lot and landscaped medians. Surrounding land uses include multi- family <br />residential development to the north, a mobile home park (Traitor Haven) to the east and south and commercial and <br />industrial uses to the west across Washington Avenue. The proposed 66 -unit residential development would complement <br />rather than divide the established community by replacing the existing commercial office land use located in a primarily <br />residential area with residential uses. Therefore, the proposed project would not disrupt or divide the physical <br />arrangement of the community established by existing uses. <br />b) The .City of San Leandro General Plan contains various policies pertaining to land use, housing, circulation and <br />transportation, open space, recreation and noise, which could be applicable to the proposed project. The proposed project <br />involves the creation of a new general plan land use designation and zoning district, in order to allow for the proposed <br />residential development to be built on a parcel that is currently zoned Professional Office "P (AU)" with a General Plan <br />designation Office "OF ". By changing the underlying zoning and general plan designation to Residential Multi - Family <br />(RM -1800) and High Density Residential (HDR), the project will comply with applicable general plan policies and <br />zoning requirements. As a result, the proposed project will not conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy or <br />regulation and will therefore not have a potentially significant effect. <br />C) There are no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans in effect within the project area. The <br />project site has been previously graded and disturbed, contains a commercial office development and a paved parking <br />area and is surrounded on three sides by existing residential development (See Figure 3). Accordingly, the proposed <br />project would not conflict with any habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans and will therefore have <br />no impact. Therefore, no mitigation is required. <br />i <br />a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral , 9 <br />resource that would be of value to the region and the <br />7xxl,4, <br />residents of the state? <br />b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally, important <br />9 <br />min eral resource recovery site delineated on a local <br />g eneral plan, specific plan or other land use Ian? <br />EXPLANATION: <br />a, b) The State legislation protecting mineral resource zones is the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975. Part of the <br />purpose of the act is to classify mineral resources in the State and to transmit the information to local governments which <br />regulate land use in each region of the State. Local governments are responsible for designating lands that contain <br />regionally- significant mineral resources in local general plans to assure resource conservation in areas of intensive <br />competing land uses. The law has resulted in the preparation of Mineral Land Classification Maps delineating Mineral <br />Resource Zones (MRZ ) 1 through 4 for aggregate resources (sand, gravel and stone), <br />2450 Washington Avenue Apartments 16 October 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.