Laserfiche WebLink
2450 Washington Avenue Apartments 17 October 2011 <br />POTENTIALLY <br />POTENTIALLY <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />LESS THAN <br />ISSUES <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />UNLESS <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />IMPAOCT <br />SOURCES <br />ISSUES <br />MITIGATION <br />IMPACT <br />INCORPORATED <br />The project area is classified by the California Geological Survey as MRZ -1, a Mineral Resource Zone for which there is <br />adequate information to indicate there are no aggregate mineral resources present. Consequently, there would be no <br />impact on mineral resources with project implementation and no mitigation measures are required. <br />- <br />- - - <br />a. <br />Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in X 4,10 <br />excess of standards established in the local general <br />plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of <br />other agencies? <br />b. <br />Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive <br />X <br />4,10 <br />roundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? <br />C. <br />A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise <br />X <br />4,10 <br />levels in the project vicinity above levels existing <br />without the project? <br />d. <br />A substantial temporary or periodic increase in <br />X <br />4,10 <br />ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above <br />levels existing without the project? <br />e. <br />For a project located within an airport land use plan or <br />X <br />4,10 <br />where such a plan has not been adopted within 2 miles <br />of a public airport or public use airport, would the <br />project expose people residing or working in the <br />p roject area to excessive noise levels? <br />f. <br />For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, <br />X <br />4 <br />would the project expose people residing or working in <br />the project area to excessive noise levels? <br />EXPLANATION: <br />a -d) <br />Development of the project site with a 66 -unit residential subdivision will bring new sensitive receptors into the project <br />area. Existing ambient noise in the vicinity of the project site is predominantly due to vehicular traffic along San <br />Leandro Boulevard and Washington Avenue. Noise is also generated by the BART train which transects the city and is <br />located 411 feet west of the project site. An acoustical study was prepared for the project that quantified the noise <br />environment at the project site and provided recommended mitigation measures to ensure that the proposed project is in <br />compliance with City and State standards (Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc., September 24, 2008). To quantify the <br />existing noise environment, three continuous long -term 144 -hour (L1 through L2) and four short -term, 15- minute (S1 <br />through S6) noise monitor measurements between July I and July 3, 2008 were taken. <br />In accordance with the City of San Leandro Noise Element, the proposed project must strive to maintain an exterior noise <br />level of no more than 60 dB Ldn (day -night average sound level) in residential areas. <br />After project build -out, exterior noise levels were projected to be approximately 67 dB at the pool area. As stated in the <br />City's Noise Element, the city acknowledges that some areas of San Leandro are exposed to exterior noise levels above <br />an Ldn of 60 dB and states that noise abatement features should be included to benefit these areas. The pool area is <br />surrounded by a six -foot high sound -rated fence which serves to reduce exterior noise levels at the pool area. To meet <br />interior noise levels and the associated Building Code DNL 45 dB requirement, it will be necessary for some of the <br />facades to be sound rated. As a result, the minimum STC3 ratings will be needed at some of the project's exterior <br />windows and doors. <br />2450 Washington Avenue Apartments 17 October 2011 <br />