Laserfiche WebLink
May Revision. Under California law, in May of each year the Governor issues a revised <br />budget with changes he or she can support, based on the debate, analysis and changes in the <br />economic forecasts (the "May Revision "). On May 16, 2011, Governor Brown issued his <br />proposed May Revision of the State Budget. The May Revision reflected an assumed $6.6 <br />billion in new state revenues over the current and budget years ($3.3 billion each year). In <br />January 2011, the Governor had projected that, absent such solutions, budget gaps averaging <br />more than $20 billion would continue for the next four years. By the time of the 2011 -12 May <br />Revision, these projected deficits had been reduced to around $10 billion per year through fiscal <br />year 2014 -15, as a result of permanent expenditure reductions enacted in March 2011. The <br />Governor called for the Legislature to adopt $11 billion in new solutions to rebuild a modest <br />reserve. The Governor planned to use almost all of the $6.6 billion in new revenues to reduce <br />the need for some targeted tax extensions and to start paying down the State's $35 billion in <br />debt. <br />The May Revision proposed that the Legislature act by the end of June 2011 to approve <br />and the voters ratify in November 2011 the extension of current sales tax and vehicle license <br />fee rates and the dependent credit exemption level for five years. If these tax extensions were <br />approved, the budget provides an additional $3 billion to schools in 2011 -12. This $3 billion was <br />over and above the 2011 -12 $49.4 billion Proposition 98 guarantee and funding level approved <br />by the Legislature in March 2011. It was approximately $1 billion above the $51.3 billion funding <br />level included in the Governor's January budget. However, the Governor proposed that $2.85 <br />billion of the $3 billion go toward eliminating deferrals, not toward increased revenue limit <br />funding. Additional revenues generated by the tax extensions would fund a major realignment of <br />public safety programs. <br />The Governor proposed that the remaining savings from revenue increases and future <br />revenue growth above current program funding be dedicated to paying off the State's $35 billion <br />in debt. Under the Governor's proposal, at least $29 billion in deferrals and debt would be paid <br />off by Fiscal Year 2014 -15. The Governor's May Revision removed the proposed income tax <br />extension and his proposal to eliminate the enterprise tax credit. The Governor continued to <br />push for the elimination of redevelopment agencies. <br />May 19, 2011 LAO Report. The LAO's May 19, 2011 report on the Governor's May <br />Revision concludes that the Governor's budget estimates in the May Revision were based on <br />reasonable assumptions. However, the LAO notes, school districts, counties and the State <br />faced uncertainty as to funding levels in the fiscal year because the Governor's revenue <br />assumptions rely on the extension of temporary increases in personal income tax, sales and <br />use tax and vehicle license fees to be approved by the voters. The LAO deemed the Governor's <br />proposals worthy of legislative consideration, noting that in past budgets the State was unable <br />to make significant inroads into its underlying operating shortfall due to a reliance on one -time <br />and short -term solutions. In 2011, an estimated $6.6 billion improvement in state tax <br />collections, and $13 billion in budgetary solutions already adopted by the Legislature, put the <br />State in the position to dramatically reduce its budget problem in coming years. <br />Budget Bills Passed by Legislature; Vetoed by Governor. On June 15, 2011, the <br />Legislature, with Democrats representing a majority thereof, passed a series of bills, including <br />two budget bills without Republican support. On June 16, 2011, Governor Brown vetoed both <br />budget bills. A series of trailer bills to the budget bills, including a set of bills that would redirect <br />funds away from or terminate the existence of redevelopment agencies (ABX1 27 and ABX1 26, <br />respectively), were passed by the Legislature and signed by the Governor. <br />24 <br />