3B Public Hearing 2012 0221 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? El Potentially El 2 Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction Significant or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological or water Potentially Unless Less than quality impacts. Significant Mitigation Significant b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any hazardous impacts. f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction El El El 2 or physical improvements that could result in any hazardous impacts. g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency El El El 2 response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any hazardous impacts. h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death El El El 2 involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any hazardous impacts. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? El El El 2 Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological or water quality impacts. b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with El El El 2 groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological or water quality impacts. c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, El El El 2 including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological or water quality impacts. d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, El including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological or water quality impacts. e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of El El El 2 existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological or water quality impacts.