3B Public Hearing 2012 0221 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

IX. LAND USE PLANNING. Would the project: a. Physically divide an established community? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could physically divide an established community. El Potentially El 2 b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an El Significant El 2 agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the Potentially Unless Less than general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinances) Significant Mitigation Significant adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological or water quality impacts. The landscape ordinances will reduce overall water consumption in the city. g. Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal El El El 2 Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard El El El 2 delineation map? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological or water quality impacts. h. Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede El El El 2 or redirect flood flows? ( Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological or water quality impacts. i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death El El El 2 involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological or water quality impacts. j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? El El El 2 Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological or water quality impacts. IX. LAND USE PLANNING. Would the project: a. Physically divide an established community? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could physically divide an established community. El El El 2 b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an El El El 2 agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinances) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements and will not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation that was adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Any projects built pursuant to these code changes would be subject to their own, new independent environmental review. These changes do not encourage development. c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community El El El 2 conservation plan? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements and will not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. X. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be El El El 2 of value to the region and the residents of the state? Comment The proposed ordinance will not result in any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any impacts to mineral resources.