Laserfiche WebLink
File Number: 12 -152 <br />Marga Lacabe commented that the proposed zoning changes are a strategy in the Faith <br />Fellowship case, and not about zoning law. <br />Gary Mortara commented that if this zoning proposal is a reaction to the Faith Fellowship <br />litigation, it is an overreaction. He urged the Committee not to limit the uses in the <br />industrial zones. Mr. Mortara stated that, rather than sue the City, he preferred the City <br />find him another building for his church. <br />Dan Dillman commented that the Committee can send an encouraging and unifying <br />message to businesses that may want to locate in San Leandro, and put the people first, <br />by not overly restricting uses in the industrial zones. <br />Darlene Evans made various comments regarding zoning issues. <br />Whit Magor commented that bringing new businesses to San Leandro is exciting, and that <br />imposing limits on them is a mistake. <br />Dave Johnson commented that the proposed changes would hinder the ability to attract <br />capital to this community and retain existing businesses. Mr. Johnson suggested that, <br />rather than an outright ban, conditional use should be retained with the proper conditions <br />established. <br />Eric Flowers asked if research has been done to determine the amount of tax revenue <br />generated in the subject zones. <br />End of Public Comments <br />A Committee discussion ensued. The Committee concurred that the matter should be <br />returned without recommendation to the full Council for further discussion. <br />City Attorney Jayne Williams noted that the matter was continued from the March 5th City <br />Council meeting to the March 19th meeting. Staff was requested to prepare a detailed <br />presentation on Recommendation #2. <br />2. Public Comments <br />None. <br />3. Committee Member Comments <br />.em <br />4. Adjourn <br />The meeting was adjourned at 5:46 p.m. <br />City of San Leandro Page 3 Printed on 312712012 <br />