My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RulesCommunications Highlights 2012 0925
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Rules & Communications Committee
>
RulesCommunications Highlights 2012 0925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2012 1:28:34 PM
Creation date
10/10/2012 11:34:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
9/25/2012
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2012 1015 CS+RG Amended
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2012\Packet 2012 1015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br />̱æ Ó»³± ¬± Ó»³¾»®ô Ý·¬§ ݱ«²½·´ Ϋ´» ¿²¼ ݱ³³«²·½¿¬·±² ݱ³³·¬¬»» <br />Ú®±³æ η½¸¿®¼ Üò з± α¼¿ <br />λæ ÜÎßÚÌ Ó»¼·½¿´ Ý¿²²¿¾· Ü·°»²¿®§ Ñ®¼·²¿²½» <br />Ü¿¬»æ Í»°¬»³¾»® îïô îðïî <br />п¹»æ î <br /> <br /> <br />under), parks and recreation facility) <br />those uses. The ordinance also pr <br />residential zone; and <br />(2) Provides for a dispensary permit application process, an application fee, and an annual <br />dispensary permit fee, to be determined by the City Council; and <br />(3) Standards for the operation of a dispensary including recordkeeping requirements to <br />insure compliance with State law, employee background checks, facilities, and security <br />amongst others; and <br />(4) Enforcement if the dispensary fails to follow applicable laws or the ordinance, including <br />suspension and revocation processes. <br />Please also find below a table that explains the current status of relevant medical marijuana <br />litigation, as requested by Councilmember Souza. <br />CaseCurrent Status <br />City of Lake Forest v. Evergreen Holistic otal ban is <br />Collective <br />(2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 1413, rev. preempted by the Compassionate Use Act <br />granted by California Supreme Court, (CUA) and the Medical Marijuana Program <br />S201454.Act (MMPA). <br />-City enacted a ban calling dispensaries a -The case is before the Cal. Supreme Court, <br />per se public nuisanceso it is not the law. <br />People v. G3 Holistic, Inc. (2011); non-otal banof <br />published opinion; rev. granted by California dispensariesin its zoning ordinanceisnot <br />SupremeCourt, S198395preempted by theCUA/MMPA. <br />-City enacted its ban through its zoning -The case is before the Cal. Supreme Court, <br />ordinance.so it is not the law. <br />Appeals court ruled that a local public <br />Health & Wellness Center, Inc. <br />(2011) 200 nuisance lawthat bans dispensariesisnot <br />Cal.App.4th 885; rev. granted by California preempted bytheCUA/MMPA <br />Supreme Court S198638-The case is before the Cal. Supreme Court, <br />-so it is not the law. <br />ß ÐÎÑÚÛÍÍ×ÑÒßÔ ÔßÉ ÝÑÎÐÑÎßÌ×ÑÒ ÑßÕÔßÒÜ ÔÑÍ ßÒÙÛÔÛÍ ÍßÝÎßÓÛÒÌÑ ÍßÒ ÚÎßÒÝ×ÍÝÑ ÍßÒÌß ÎÑÍß ÚÎÛÍÒÑ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.