Laserfiche WebLink
<br />̱æ Ó»³± ¬± Ó»³¾»®­ô Ý·¬§ ݱ«²½·´ Ϋ´»­ ¿²¼ ݱ³³«²·½¿¬·±²­ ݱ³³·¬¬»» <br />Ú®±³æ η½¸¿®¼ Üò з± α¼¿ <br />λæ ÜÎßÚÌ Ó»¼·½¿´ Ý¿²²¿¾·­ Ü·­°»²­¿®§ Ñ®¼·²¿²½» <br />Ü¿¬»æ Í»°¬»³¾»® îïô îðïî <br />п¹»æ í <br /> <br /> <br />Pack v. Superior Court <br />(2011) 199 -Dismissed by California Supreme Court. <br />dismissed <br />Cal.App.4th 1070; rev. granted, - <br />by Cal. Supreme Court, S197169ordinance allowing dispensaries with a <br />permit is preempted by federal law. <br />-Federal preemption is still an issue, and has <br />not been clearly decided. <br />-Unpublished court of appeal decision, so it <br />is not the law <br />County of Los Angeles v. Alternative <br />Medicinal Cannabis Collective <br />(July 2, the CUA/MMPA <br />2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 601 (2d Distr., Div. -County was the regulatory agency in this <br />1).case. <br />-Review before Cal. Supreme Court is <br />pending, but has not been granted. <br />-This case is the current law <br />RDP:RDP <br />Enclosure <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ß ÐÎÑÚÛÍÍ×ÑÒßÔ ÔßÉ ÝÑÎÐÑÎßÌ×ÑÒ ÑßÕÔßÒÜ ÔÑÍ ßÒÙÛÔÛÍ ÍßÝÎßÓÛÒÌÑ ÍßÒ ÚÎßÒÝ×ÍÝÑ ÍßÒÌß ÎÑÍß ÚÎÛÍÒÑ <br />