My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2C Presentation 2013 0304
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
Packet 2013 0304
>
2C Presentation 2013 0304
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2013 11:07:11 AM
Creation date
2/27/2013 11:05:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
3/4/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2013 0304 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 0304
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Appendices <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Page B-28 <br />Overall Support for Greenhouse Gas Reduction: <br /> <br />Overall, ninety-two percent of those surveyed say that they would support city-led efforts to <br />meet mandated greenhouse gas emissions targets. Forty-six percent of respondents support <br />voluntary measures only, while twenty percent support the idea of city-mandated requirements. <br />Surprisingly, twenty-five percent of those surveyed would support mandatory requirements and <br />increased taxes, which was supported by only sixteen percent of respondents in the June <br />survey. <br />The idea of levying new taxes generated the most comments. While some respondents said <br />they opposed any new taxes, especially given the current economic situation, others were open <br />to the idea. ―(I) would have to learn more about the taxes to support them,‖ wrote one <br />commenter, suggesting ―perhaps household-income sliding scale taxes.‖ Another survey taker <br />wrote, ―I don't think the citizens should pay more taxes, but companies should (the large ones <br />such as Wal-Mart, Target, etc).‖ Others suggested using tax revenue to reduce the cost of <br />permits for installing solar panels. <br />At least one survey taker said that the city is not setting ambitious enough goals, writing ―San <br />Leandro should set its GHG reduction goals to be closer in line with the CAP goals of Oakland
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.