Laserfiche WebLink
Potentially, <br />Significant fmpaot <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Vnless <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less, than <br />Significant <br />Impact No Inipact <br />h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death <br />involving wildland fires, including where wlldlands are adjacent to <br />urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? <br />Comment: The proposed wind turbine will not result in a wildland fire risk* <br />• D n X <br />: IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: <br />a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? • 0 •v X <br />b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with <br />groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer <br />volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the <br />• • . • X <br />production rate of pre-existing nearby weils would drop to a level which <br />would not support existing land uses of planned uses for tyhich permits <br />have been granted)? <br />c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, . <br />including through the alteration of the course' of a stream or river, in a <br />manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? <br />• • a X <br />d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site br area, <br />including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or <br />substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner <br />which would result in flooding Oh- Of off-site? ; <br />• • Q X <br />e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of <br />, existing or planned storrpwater drainage systems or provide substantial <br />additional sources of polluted runoff? <br />• • a X <br />f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? <br />Comment a.-f,; The Placement of the wind turbine will involve minimal <br />disturbance of the site vyith a footprint of 20 feet by 20 feet or 400 square <br />feet. This placement is not anticipated to violate water quality standards or <br />waste discharge requirements, it will not substantially deplete groundwater <br />supplies or substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site, <br />result in substantial erosion or increase the rate of runoff or otherwise <br />substantially degrade Water quality. . <br />• • • X <br />9-Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal <br />Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard <br />delineation rn&p? <br />• • • % <br />Comment: The Drdcosed wind turbine does not involve the placement of <br />housing. <br />h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area; structures which would impede <br />or redirect flood flows? <br />Comment: The proposed wind turbine is not in a 100-vear flood zone. <br />d • ' X <br />i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death <br />involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or • • • X <br />dam? <br />Comment: The prooosed wind turbine would not exoose oeoole or <br />structures to a flooding risk. <br />j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? <br />Comment: The oroDosed wind turbine would not result in an inundation <br />risk. <br />• ' • • X <br />o • X. LAND USE PLANNING. Would the project <br />a. Physically divide an established community? • • :• X <br />10