Laserfiche WebLink
Potentially Significant <br />Impact <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Unless <br />Miligatldri <br />Incorporated <br />Less than <br />Significant Impact No Impact <br />b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an <br />agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the <br />general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinances) <br />adopted forthe purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? <br />• Q • X <br />c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community <br />conservation plan? , <br />Comment a!-icu The Proposed wind turbine would not result in new <br />construction that could divide a community or conflict with any land use <br />' policy or plan. It would not conflict with any habitat conservation or natural <br />commtihity conservation plan. The wind turbine is in compliance With San <br />Leandro General Plan Policy 7.03 related to Sustainable Manufacturing as <br />well as the San Leandro Cliniate Action Plan Goai 3.3 to increase <br />residential, commercial and industrial renewable energy use. <br />• • • X <br />xi. MINERAL RESOURCES, would the project <br />a. Result in the joss of availability of a knowri mineral resource that would be <br />of value tb the region and the residents of the state? 0. • X <br />b. Result in the loss of availability ofa ideally important mineral resource <br />recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land <br />use plan? <br />Comment a.-b.: The oroObsed wind turbine will not result in anv impacts to <br />mineral resources. <br />• • • .. X <br />XII. NOISE. Would the project result in: <br />a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards; n • X P <br />standards of other agencies? <br />b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration <br />or groundborne noise levels? <br />Comment: The nroposed wind turbine is not anticipated to result in <br />groundborne vibration or noise levels, <br />• • 0 •: x <br />c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project <br />vicinity above Jeveis existing without the project? • • 0 X <br />d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the <br />project vicinity above levels existing without the project? • 0 .• X <br />e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan <br />has not been adopted, within two miles of a pubfe airport or public use <br />airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the prpject: <br />area to excessive noise levels? <br />0 • o. X <br />f> For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project <br />expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise <br />levels? (n/aj: <br />Comment a., c.-f.: The orooosed wind turbine is located in a General <br />Industrial area. The nearest residences are located approximately 500 feet <br />away and have been constructed to minimize noise from -aircraft operations <br />• 0 X • <br />specifications provided by the applicant confirm that the wind turbine is <br />designed to not exceed 55 decibels. Further^ the manufacturer <br />specifications .for this turbine State that there are no audible tones or <br />impulses 56 meters or 184 feet from the turbine. This is within the <br />accepiduic rdnge Tor inuusinat as wsii as r6SiQ©nii8i us>©s. i n© oeriGrai <br />Plan lists 55 dbas Normally Acceptable in the residential areas and 65-80 <br />db as Normally Acceptable in the industrial areas; The proposed wind <br />turbine placement Would result in a less than significant noise impact. <br />11