Laserfiche WebLink
address existing trees that obstruct on-shore winds if the turbine is limited to the zoning <br /> ordinance height standard, which finding is set forth below. The staff report also described and <br /> analyzed a February 7, 2013 comment letter from Howard Beckman, and discussed the alleged <br /> prejudice issue; and <br /> WHEREAS,the City Council reviewed the staff report,the adopted MND, the Project, <br /> the Beckman letter,the Board of Zoning Adjustments approvals in Resolutions 01-13 and 02-13, <br /> and the appeal, at a noticed public hearing on April 1, 2013 at which time all interested parties <br /> had the opportunity to be heard; and <br /> WHEREAS,the record of proceedings for the Project includes,but is not limited to,the <br /> Project application and related materials, reports,photo simulations; the MND; technical reports <br /> prepared in connection with the Project and MND; the responses to comments on the MND; <br /> Board of Zoning Adjustments staff report and resolutions; City Council staff report; other related <br /> project and environmental documents. The documents and materials constituting the record of <br /> proceedings, including all of the documents incorporated herein by reference, are available for <br /> review in the Planning Services Division at the City of San Leandro City Hall, 835 East 14th <br /> Street, San Leandro, California 94577, during normal business hours. The location and <br /> custodian of the draft revised MND and other documents that constitute the record of <br /> proceedings for the Project is the City of San Leandro Planning Services Division, attn: Elmer <br /> Penaranda. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED THAT: <br /> A. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this resolution. <br /> B. The City Council reviewed and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration <br /> adopted through Resolution 01-13,prior to acting on the appeal. <br /> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration <br /> adequately describes the environmental impacts of the Project. On the basis of the whole record <br /> before it, the City Council affirms the Board of Zoning Adjustments decisions in Resolution 01- <br /> 13 that a)the Project, as mitigated, would avoid or reduce the potentially significant biology, <br /> geology and airport hazard impacts to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; <br /> and, b)there is no substantial evidence that the Project as mitigated may have a significant effect <br /> on the environment with respect to aesthetics, biology, geology, airport hazards, noise, or any <br /> other environmental resource. In affirming the MND decision, the City Council hereby modifies <br /> and updates the findings in Paragraph 3 of Resolution 01-13 as follows: <br /> 1. Based on the whole record, including but not limited to the revised MND with <br /> responses to comments, and all supporting information, studies, and evidence, there is no <br /> substantial evidence supporting a fair argument of significant impact from the Project as <br /> mitigated. <br /> RESOLUTION NO.2013-043 2 <br />