My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2D Presentation 2013 1007
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
Packet 2013 1007
>
2D Presentation 2013 1007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2013 2:40:43 PM
Creation date
10/2/2013 2:39:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
10/7/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2013 1007 RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 1007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
50 <br /> <br />List of parcels designated on the Vulnerability to Change Map <br />The Vulnerability to Change Map is a tool used to help recognize geographical patterns of properties that <br />may have greater or lesser propensity to change from an urban (re)development perspective. Such patterns <br />can help to guide the development of “broad-brush” district revitalization strategies. Patterns of <br />vulnerability can also guide where public investments in capital improvements or programs may have the <br />strongest catalytic effect on future private property developments or redevelopments – as well as where <br />gradations of regulatory differences (regarding height, setback, orientation, etc.) could be meaningful. <br />Vulnerability is indicated by color as being high, moderate, or long-term. <br /> <br />We estimate vulnerability by visually assessing sites for building coverage (i.e. the amount, si ze and kind of <br />structures on the property), land use condition, and apparent ratio of improvements to land value. Some <br />market factors are taken into account in a relative sense within the district, such as factoring site proximity <br />to highway interchanges vs. those that are remote and hard to get to. We do not take into account the <br />intentions or contractual factors of owners or tenants (nor is that information consistently available), nor do <br />we try to “drill down” to invisible things like environmental contamination that might impede development. <br />Nonetheless, the intent is not to achieve specific status accuracy for a particular parcel; it’s rather to see <br />broad patterns such as clusters or concentrations of parcel vulnerability, especially in relation to district <br />assets such as activity generators, transportation access points, etc. <br /> <br />A parcel indicated as high vulnerability (shown in red ●) indicates there is little or nothing to be demolished <br />in order to develop the site with new buildings and improvements. The existing ratio of improvements to <br />land value is thus low. The assumed timeframe of potential change would be immediate to withi n one to <br />two years. <br /> <br />A parcel classified as moderate vulnerability (shown in orange ●) indicates that on-site buildings or <br />structures are vacant, are of obsolescent condition/format, and/or show relatively low coverage and value. <br />The site may be underutilized as well. Alternatively, some moderately vulnerable sites may have well - <br />tenanted buildings in good repair that would not be vulnerable in other locations, but due to proximity to <br />larger and more highly vulnerable sites as well as their own high access and visibility location, they may be <br />subject to greater vulnerability to change than otherwise. The assumed timeframe of change would be <br />between two and four years. <br /> <br />A parcel designated with long-term vulnerability (shown in yellow ● ) indicates that a combination of low <br />site coverage, older or underutilized building conditions, and vacancy or a current non-temporary tenant <br />means a longer term possibility of development change that may occur on the site. The assumed timeframe <br />of change would be more than four years. Note: industrial district parcels often support a transportation, <br />vehicle repair or construction yard-related use activity with low building coverage. Parcels of this type may <br />also be designated with long-term vulnerability. This reflects no assumption or beliefs about the intentions <br />or longevity of these businesses – it simply notes that if the business tenant or owner at some point makes a <br />decision that closes or relocates the operation from the parcel, the site has few apparent physical <br />impediments to its re-development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.