My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2013-136
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2013
>
Reso 2013-136
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2013 9:13:29 AM
Creation date
10/25/2013 9:08:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
10/21/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
8H Consent 2013 1021
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 1021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />HUD has provided four "safe harbor"1 provisions for determining the eligible population of LEP <br />persons to be served by a LAP. In essence, a safe harbor is a program criterion which, when <br />met, is evidence that the agency implementing the LAP has made a reasonable effort to identify <br />LEP persons who may need language services. <br /> <br />To meet our LEP obligations, the City must take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to <br />LEP persons. To balance the need for access to critical services while not imposing undue <br />financial burdens, the City conducted an assessment of need that balances the following four <br />factors: <br />(1) The number or proportion of LEP persons eligible to be served or likely to be <br />encountered by the program or grantee; <br />(2) The frequency with which LEP persons come in contact with the program; <br />(3) The nature and importance of the program, activity, or service provided by the program; <br />and, <br />(4) The resources available and costs to the grantee/recipient. <br /> <br />Factor 1: The number or proportion of LEP persons served or eligible to be served or likely to <br />be encountered by the program or grantee. <br /> <br />To determine need, SLTMO considered language services needed by current program <br />participants and applicants, as well as outreach to potential participants. SLTMO updated the <br />language needs by evaluating data from the US Census Bureau 2011 American Community <br />Survey’s (ACS) One-Year Estimate. <br />According to ACS, 33% of San Leandrans in 2011 were foreign born. Among people at least five <br />years old living in San Leandro in 2011 50.7% spoke a language other than English at home. <br />Census questionnaires ask respondents to rate their English proficiency, and people's ratings of <br />their own English abilities contribute to LEP statistics. Of those speaking a language other than <br />English, 27.7% indicated they spoke English less than “very well”, persons categorized as the <br />LEP population. <br />The ACS statistics break down as follows: <br /> <br /> <br />1 A "safe harbor", in the context of this guidance, means that the recipient has undertaken efforts to comply with respect to <br />the needed translation of vital written materials. If a recipient conducts the four-factor analysis, determines that LEP <br />applicants or beneficiaries need translated documents, adopts a LAP that specifies the translation of vital materials, and <br />makes the necessary translations, then the recipient provides strong evidence, in its records or in reports to the agency <br />providing federal financial assistance, that it has made reasonable efforts to provide written language assistance. <br />http://www.hud.gov/offices/fheo/promotingfh/lep-faq.cfm#q19.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.