My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action 2013 1118 Attachment
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
Packet 2013 1118
>
10A Action 2013 1118 Attachment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2013 4:53:36 PM
Creation date
11/13/2013 4:53:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
11/18/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
10A Action 2013 1118
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 1118
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> Managing Tomorrow’s Resources Today <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Gary Wolff <br />October 4, 2013 <br />Page 11 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />represents a loss of economies of scale for staffing. The ratio of staff to management personnel is <br />3.5:2.0, or 1.75, far lower than that for the System Expansion. In summary, the System Expansion <br />provides the most efficient staffing and the best leveraging of management time. <br />The second largest area of cost, the transportation and disposal contract, is generally less subject to <br />control since costs are largely a function of the volume and character of material collected, and the <br />volume varies in linear fashion with the number of households served. This is not to say that Program <br />staff cannot, and do not closely manage the transportation and disposal contract. Over a number of <br />cycles of bidding the contract, the Program has developed increasing ability to direct how services are <br />delivered. A key variable is contract staffing, the use of contract employees as “temporary labor” has <br />proven to be a very cost‐effective means for meeting increases in short‐term staffing needs. <br />There are a number of areas in which greater Program size allows for increased efficiency, many of them <br />a function of regulatory requirements. For example, State law forbids business waste acceptance at the <br />same time and place as household waste, which can reduce facility operational efficiency. In addition, <br />material packaging and shipping requirements and staffing supervision requirements both favor <br />economies of scale at greater operational levels. The Proposed System Expansion provides for better <br />capture of these efficiencies. <br />PaintCare Stewardship Program <br />The PaintCare Product Stewardship Program (PaintCare) is a private sector alternative to financing and <br />operating an architectural paint collection program, established pursuant to state law. “Architectural <br />paint” is a subset of “paint” consisting of paints, stains and coatings for architectural surfaces. PaintCare <br />will reduce some Program costs, and has the potential to provide a net reduction in other operating <br />costs for managing these materials. PaintCare is one of the first statewide EPR strategies. <br />Only about 60 percent to 80 percent of all paints sold, by volume are eligible for coverage through <br />PaintCare. PaintCare is a new program, and the amount it captures will increase over time. It is unknown <br />how effective PaintCare will be in capturing all eligible paints. PaintCare provides the Program packaging <br />materials that meet federal regulatory requirements, and transportation and recycling/disposal service <br />for covered products at no cost to the Program’s disposal contractor, and hence to the Program. <br />PaintCare will also reimburse the County’s contractor for certain expenses incurred in bulking paint ‐ <br />removing paint from partially full cans and consolidating it into 55 gallon drums. These reimbursements <br />are passed on to the Program in the form of credits, as cash against expenses, credits of labor hours and <br />replenishment of packaging supplies at no cost to the program. <br />PaintCare does not reimburse collection costs, most labor expenses, overhead, advertising, training or <br />other general costs involved in establishing and operating a collection program – which the Program <br />indicates represent about 50% to 70% of costs for handling these materials. In addition, in order to take <br />advantage of PaintCare the Program must sort the incoming paint waste stream more rigorously than in <br />pre‐PaintCare days to ensure non‐covered products are screened out of the PaintCare waste stream. In <br />addition, PaintCare materials are manifested and shipped separately from non‐covered materials adding <br />complexity and cost for storage, shipment preparation and recordkeeping.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.