Minutes 1993 0201 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Minutes - San Leandro City Council Meeting - February 1, 1993 Page - 9 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) Council Member Corbett asked if the Symons property was I-P. Mr. Weisbrod said in 1983 it was I-P, in 1986 it was re-zoned to I-2. Council Member Faria disagreed and said, in 1986, it was re-zoned to I-P. Council Member Corbett said the point is, since 1986, all of the parcels have been I-P. Mr. Weisbrod said this was correct. He said the building that was burned received a Planned Development but was subsequently re-zoned from I-P to 1-2, so the Planned Development was not longer binding. He said it was re-zoned within the last year. The City Council asked questions and Mr. Weisbrod responded on zoning of other properties in the area. Mayor Karp suggested that, since questions were arising related to the following Public Hearing, A-92-07, the two Hearings be combined. The City Council therefore opened the Public Hearing on A-92-07 and combined the discussion with A-92-02. B. Matter of Appeal by Douglas T. Federighi of the Planning Commission's Denial of A-92-07; Re-Zone from the I-P (Industrial Park) District to the I-2 (General Industrial ) District; 2515 Through 2553 Williams Street, Douglas T. Federighi , Owner; and 2502 Williams Street, Associated Aerospace Activities, Owner; Located at the Northwesterly Corner of Williams Street and Aurora Drive; Assessor's Parcel Number 79A-541-17-2 and 18; Planning Commission Resolution of Intention No. 10-92-8. Mayor Karp said surveyors are doing a Final Map on the entrance into the park from Davis Street, and there is an Agreement from Oakland Scavenger Company. Mr. Weisbrod said, when the Transfer Station came to the BZA to make changes in its operation, the City required that they work with the City on dedication of some land on their northern boundary to obtain a wider street and access to the park along Davis Street. Council Member Corbett said East Bay Regional Park District is concerned that industrial uses will cause toxics to run into the slough. Mr. Weisbrod said any uses that allow toxics require a Conditional Use Permit, and the Permit can be Conditioned to control or mitigate any problems. He said this type of control could be required in either District. Council Member Corbett said it appears all improvements have been made in terms of aesthetics, but the issue seems not to be the appearance, but the use, of the property. Mr. Weisbrod said this was correct. Council Member Corbett asked if it would be possible under I-2 to preserve the I-P improvements already in place. Mr. Meyers said, when property is re-zoned from a less-restrictive zone to a more restrictive