Minutes 1993 1004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

• •• Minutes - San Leandro City Council Meeting - October 4, 1993 Page - 9 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) The following Motion was then introduced: Minute Order No. 93-77. On motion by Council Member Corbett, who moved its approval , seconded by Council Member Kerr, and carried by the following called vote, the City Council approved PD-93-3, GDP; Planned Unit Development, General Development Plan. (1009) AYES: Council Members Corbett, Kerr, Myers, Perry, Polvorosa; Mayor Faria ( 6 ) NOES: None ( 0 ) ABSENT: Council Member Nahm ( 1 ) ' C. Matter of PD-91-3. PDP; Roberts' Landing Precise Development Plan. This being the time and place for the Public Hearing on the above matter, Steve Emslie, Planning Manager, provided introductory comments and an overview. He introduced staff members and consultants available to answer questions and said the Applicant was in attendance with his land use and hazardous material consultant. He said the purpose of the Hearing was to hear from the public regarding the amendment to the General Development Plan which would allow for setback of not more than 10 lots to 10 feet; the Development Agreement; the Vesting Tentative Map for Phase 1A; and the recommended approval of the Precise Development Plan, including specific lotting and street pattern for the first phase of the General Development Plan. He explained the EIR was a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report which supplemented the EIR the Council certified last year when it approved the General Development Plan, and which was an outgrowth of the General Development Plan EIR. He said both of these documents constituted the record. He said CEQA requirements for public review and public comment had already been satisfied. He said the Precise Development Plan and the General Development Plan address separate issues; the General Development Plan EIR addresses the full range of issues and the Precise Development Plan specifically talks about toxics, hazardous materials, buffer, and drainage pattern. He explained the two-step process the City uses in making approvals -- the General Development process and the Precise Development process. He said the two EIR's constitute the City's approval of the project, are consistent and remain with the project throughout the end. He said the GDP and the PDP both apply equally and remain in full force until the project is converted to an alternate land use. He said he received an anonymous call from someone who was unable to attend due to illness but opposes the project based on concerns regarding toxic contamination and the potential threat to public safety, health and welfare and who felt it should retain the environmental qualities of a wildlife habitat.