Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes - San Leandro City Council Meeting - June 17, 1991 Page - 10 - <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) <br /> The City Council said they felt these high fees would deter people from <br /> applying for smaller permits, such as home occupation and fence <br /> modifications. Vice Mayor Glaze said he felt that some sort of <br /> administrative procedure was needed to process smaller applications <br /> such as fence modifications. <br /> The City Council felt that some constituents would be cut off from City <br /> Hall through the proposed high fees. The City Council also asked <br /> questions regarding the process for charging direct costs and overhead. <br /> They said they would like to see break-downs within each category for <br /> smaller types of uses. <br /> Mr. Jermanis recommended that no changes be made to the existing fee <br /> schedule for the Planning Division at this time, and that staff provide <br /> a report in the future to the City Council . The City Council concurred <br /> in the matter. <br /> Mr. Jermanis proceeded to describe various other fees and fee increases <br /> recommended in the proposed budget, such as refuse fees and sewer fees, <br /> which were discussed with the City Council at their May 13th work <br /> session. He further described the fees for various Building Division <br /> services. Mr. Jermanis also said the budget included a proposal to <br /> amend the current Developer Fee for Street Improvement (DFSI) fee <br /> structure. He said the fee structure was being amended to provide for <br /> an index which would adjust the fees on an annual basis, based on the <br /> construction cost index. It also added a mini-warehouse category. <br /> Roy Parker, Transportation Administrator, provided an update on the <br /> status of the DFSI fund. He noted the fees received, the <br /> appropriations, the amounts expended and unexpended, and the five-year <br /> proposed DFSI Program. <br /> John Jermanis, Finance Director, discussed the overall proposed City <br /> Budget. He said the proposed expenditures for 1991-92 are less than <br /> the current fiscal year. He also said this budget holds the line and <br /> the City Manager had directed City departments to reduce operating <br /> budgets by $1 .5 million. He discussed the summary of contingent <br /> liabilities. <br /> The City Council said the outcome of the State budget discussions is <br /> unknown at this time, so it is not known what the impact will be upon <br /> cities. <br /> Mr. Jermanis discussed the City's Economic Uncertainties Reserve Fund <br /> and how liabilities will be funded. There was discussion by the City <br /> Council on timing related to replenishing the Economic Uncertainties <br /> Reserve Fund. <br />