My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
4A Public Hearing 2015 0120
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2015
>
Packet 2015 0120
>
4A Public Hearing 2015 0120
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2015 5:08:32 PM
Creation date
1/14/2015 5:45:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
1/20/2015
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2015 0120 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2015\Packet 2015 0120
PowerPoint 4A Public Hearing 2015 0120 Housing Element
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2015\Packet 2015 0120
Reso 2015-006
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2015
Reso 2015-007
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
City of San Leandro <br />Housing Element Update (2015-2023) Project <br />Initial Study and Environmental Checklist <br />c) 1Iould the project result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels exist- <br />ing without the project? <br />Potential impacts from future residential development would stem mainly from the addition of vehicles along <br />roadways in the city. However, Implementation of the Housing Element would not change any land use des- <br />ignations and would not increase development potential in San Leandro; therefore, no additional vehicles are <br />anticipated as a result of future development under the proposed Project. The type of development envi- <br />sioned under the proposed Project would be compatible with nearby residential land uses and are either al- <br />ready developed and/or in close proximity to existing residential and residential -serving development. As dis- <br />cussed above in Section XIII.a, because residential uses are not typically associated with high levels of station- <br />ary noise generation and would be largely developed and near other residential uses, it is unlikely that any de- <br />velopments subsequent to the future development under the proposed Project would directly contribute to <br />greater increase in ambient noise levels in their surrounding areas. Therefore, the impact would be less than <br />significant. <br />d) Vould the project result in a substantial temporary orperiodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above <br />levels existing without the project? <br />Based on applicable criteria stipulated by Chapter 6, Environmental Hazards, of the General Plan, the devel- <br />opment of the future potential development associated with the proposed Project could cause temporary <br />noise impacts during construction at adjacent land uses. Potential future housing could be located in proximi- <br />ty of noise -sensitive residential areas. Construction would be localized and would occur intermittently for var- <br />ying periods of time. Prior to construction of each future development under the proposed Project, for pro- <br />jects that are not subject to separate environmental review, construction noise impacts would be addressed <br />through compliance with the City's General Plan and Zoning Code through the City's building permitting <br />process. Specifically, Policy 35.01 of the General Plan requires acoustical studies and noise mitigation <br />measures for any project located in an area that exceeds the City's noise compatibility guidelines and General <br />Plan Action 35.05-A requires conditions of approval for any new development, including construction hours <br />and operating hours to minimize the potential for noise impacts. Several methods can be implemented to <br />reduce noise during construction such as equipment selection, selecting staging areas as far as possible from <br />nearby noise sensitive areas and temporary construction walls. Compliance with the General Plan noise relat- <br />ed policies would ensure these impacts would be less than significant. <br />e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public <br />airport orpublic use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? <br />The Housing Element would not generate noise affecting people residing or working within areas covered by <br />the Metropolitan Oakland Airport Land Use Plan. Consistent with the General Plan, no additional residential <br />development is proposed within the 65 db Ldn contours associated with Oakland Airport. Most of the city's <br />housing potential is located near the two BART stations and along the East 14t', Street corridor, areas which <br />are not affected by the Airport Land Use Plan. Impacts would be less than significant as the Housing Element is <br />a policy -level document that does not contain site-specific development plans or authorize entitlements for <br />development to occur. <br />Page 140 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.