Laserfiche WebLink
City of San Leandro <br />Housing Element Update (2015-2023) Project <br />Initial Studv and Environmental Checklist <br />a) Would the project result in exposure of persons to orgeneration of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local <br />general plan or noise ordinance, or other applicable standards of other agencies? <br />The type of anticipated development associated with residential development would be restricted to the exist- <br />ing urbanized environment in areas where residential and non-residential uses are currently allowed. The pro- <br />visions of the proposed Project would not contravene any aspects of the General Plan, including land use <br />designations, noise limits, or other restrictions that address noise impacts. Though future potential develop- <br />ment that could occur under the proposed Project may potentially be noise -generating during construction <br />phases, all potential future development pursued under the proposed Project would be subject to the over- <br />sight and review processes and standards that are envisioned by the General Plan, established within the Zon- <br />ing Code, and/or otherwise required by the State and federal regulations. Compliance with these existing reg- <br />ulations would ensure that the proposed Project would neither cause new noise impacts nor exacerbate any <br />existing ones. Accordingly, noise impacts associated with implementing the proposed Project would be less <br />than significant. <br />b) Would the project result in exposure of persons to orgenerate excessive groundborne vibration orgroundborne noise levels? <br />Potential future development associated with the proposed Project would not include any new roads or <br />transportation infrastructure and therefore would not itself result directly in any new transportation -related <br />sources of vibration. The construction of residential development would not include vibration -generating <br />equipment and would not result in long-term operational vibration impacts. No impact related to long-term <br />vibration would occur. Any impacts associated with construction would be temporary and short-term. Meth- <br />ods to reduce vibration during construction would include the use of smaller equipment, use of static rollers <br />instead of vibratory rollers, and drilling piles as opposed to pile driving. Compliance with policies in Chapter <br />6, Environmental Hazards, of the General plan, together with no long-term vibration impacts would ensure <br />impacts would be less than significant. <br />Page 139 <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />XIII. NOISE <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />With <br />Mitigation <br />Less Than No <br />Would the project result in: <br />Impact <br />Incorporated <br />Significant Impact <br />a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® ❑ <br />of standards established in the local general plan or noise or- <br />dinance, or other applicable standards of other agencies? <br />b) Exposure of persons to or generate excessive groundborne <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® ❑ <br />vibration or groundborne noise levels? <br />c) Result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ ❑ <br />levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the <br />project? <br />d) Result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambi- <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® ❑ <br />ent noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing <br />without the project? <br />e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® ❑ <br />such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public <br />airport or public use airport, would the project expose people <br />residing or working in the project area to excessive noise lev- <br />els? <br />For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />project expose people residing or working in the project area <br />to excessive noise levels? <br />a) Would the project result in exposure of persons to orgeneration of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local <br />general plan or noise ordinance, or other applicable standards of other agencies? <br />The type of anticipated development associated with residential development would be restricted to the exist- <br />ing urbanized environment in areas where residential and non-residential uses are currently allowed. The pro- <br />visions of the proposed Project would not contravene any aspects of the General Plan, including land use <br />designations, noise limits, or other restrictions that address noise impacts. Though future potential develop- <br />ment that could occur under the proposed Project may potentially be noise -generating during construction <br />phases, all potential future development pursued under the proposed Project would be subject to the over- <br />sight and review processes and standards that are envisioned by the General Plan, established within the Zon- <br />ing Code, and/or otherwise required by the State and federal regulations. Compliance with these existing reg- <br />ulations would ensure that the proposed Project would neither cause new noise impacts nor exacerbate any <br />existing ones. Accordingly, noise impacts associated with implementing the proposed Project would be less <br />than significant. <br />b) Would the project result in exposure of persons to orgenerate excessive groundborne vibration orgroundborne noise levels? <br />Potential future development associated with the proposed Project would not include any new roads or <br />transportation infrastructure and therefore would not itself result directly in any new transportation -related <br />sources of vibration. The construction of residential development would not include vibration -generating <br />equipment and would not result in long-term operational vibration impacts. No impact related to long-term <br />vibration would occur. Any impacts associated with construction would be temporary and short-term. Meth- <br />ods to reduce vibration during construction would include the use of smaller equipment, use of static rollers <br />instead of vibratory rollers, and drilling piles as opposed to pile driving. Compliance with policies in Chapter <br />6, Environmental Hazards, of the General plan, together with no long-term vibration impacts would ensure <br />impacts would be less than significant. <br />Page 139 <br />