My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
7C New Business 2000 0306
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000
>
7C New Business 2000 0306
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2016 3:49:58 PM
Creation date
6/3/2016 3:20:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
3/6/2000
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
RDA Reso 2000-009
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2000
RDA Reso 2000-010
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission DOFT/UNAPPROVED F uary 24, 2000 <br /> Minute No. 2000-04 (Excerpt) Page 13 of 16 <br /> Associate City Planner Weisbrod replied that there was a requirement that the <br /> dealership provide onsite parking for all employees and that these be reserved and clearly <br /> marked. <br /> Lou Filipovich, 15376 Laverne Drive, called the project mindboggling. He said traffic <br /> had been a problem that had been discussed for decades with very little done to improve <br /> it. He cautioned that railroad spurs should only be modified or removed after <br /> consultation with rail companies. He said that the interests of the various parties -- Ford <br /> Motor Company, Chovanes Ford and Mossi -- was confusing as represented in the <br /> documents in the meeting packet. He asked staff to differentiate a joint redevelopment <br /> agency from a redevelopment agency. <br /> Secretary Hom responded that in San Leandro the joint redevelopment project pertained <br /> to a large area that includes East 14th Street that was the joint responsibility of the <br /> Alameda County and San Leandro Redevelopment Agencies. <br /> Mr. Filipovich pointed out that the staff memorandum listed the redevelopment agency <br /> containing the subject car dealership project as a "joint redevelopment agency." He said <br /> the major problem with the project was to determine who was going to pay for the street <br /> improvements. He said taxpayers had already committed $3 million dollars toward street <br /> improvements. He said it was clear that the project was a sales tax machine, which was <br /> fine, but the project was also generating redevelopment debt for the City, currently at $29 <br /> million dollars. He said he didn't feel the residents of San Leandro were getting their <br /> money's worth from the project. He said it was clear the project was going to be <br /> approved by the City Council, and it was also clear nothing would be done about the <br /> constantly-increasing traffic. He said that the problems associated with redevelopment <br /> were just beginning and that the worst was yet to come. <br /> Motion to Close the Public Hearing <br /> (Collier/Mahoney; 7 Ayes, 0 Noes) <br /> Commissioner Collier asked Ms. Swan whether the current Ed Chovanes Ford <br /> employees would be relocated to the new site. <br /> Ms. Swan said that the current employees were proposed to remain as employees under <br /> the new ownership and the relocation. She said the buy-sell agreement would close in <br /> thirty to forty days. <br /> Redevelopment Director Debbie Potter noted that as part of the buy-sell agreement <br /> Mossi Ford had agreed to honor the collective bargaining agreement. <br /> G:\ IINUTES.PC/2000/2-24-2000 <br /> 2/29/2000 <br /> 409 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.