RDA Reso 2000-009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Appendix E(Initial Study/Part 0 Page 6 19. RECREATION. YES MAYBE NO SOURCE Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality x 1 2 or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. YES MAYBE NO SOURCE a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the x 1,2,4 destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or x 1 2 4 aesthetic effects to a prehistoric, historic, or architecturally significant building, structure, or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a x 1,2,4 physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. YES MAYBE NO SOURCE a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the x 2 quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve x 2 short-term to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are x 2 individually limited but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small,but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant). 4132