Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 7 <br />1 Finance <br /> <br />DSWC, Inc. is incorporated as a private, members-only Medical Marijuana collective under current <br />California law. Specifically, DSWC is formed as a California Mutual Benefit Corporation. As such DSWC <br />will reinvest excess money received beyond the cost of operating expenses to further the goals of the <br />organization including community service, patient advocacy, and educating the public regarding the medical <br />uses of Cannabis. <br /> <br />DSWC will conduct business in a transparent manner that is compliant with all regulations and generally <br />accepted accounting principles. DSWC will manage all resources according to the highest standards for <br />nonprofit organizations within the medical Cannabis industry and elsewhere. These practices will minimize a <br />number of risks associated with operating a nonprofit dispensary and will support long-term sustainability. In <br />an effort to develop long lasting absolute trust between DSWC and the City of San Leandro, DSWC will <br />provide the City access to all books, records, accounts and relevant data upon request. <br />1.A Pro Forma and Operating Costs <br /> <br />The projected three-year quarterly estimates for operations are outlined in the Projected Income and <br />Expenditures (“Pro Forma”) statements (Exhibits 1-3). Core assumptions of the projections are as follows. <br />Line numbers are included in the Pro Forma for reference. <br /> <br />Timing – It is assumed DSWC will open within 90 days after approval of our application by the City <br />Council. Within these 90 days DSWC will work diligently with City staff to obtain all permits and approvals <br />required by the City’s ordinances, rules, and regulations, including a conditional use permit and building <br />permit. Assuming a decision by the City Council during the third quarter of this year DSWC intends to open <br />for business at the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2016. See Exhibit 4 for our anticipated timeline. <br /> <br />Revenue (Lines 1-3) – The main drivers of quarterly revenue are total average patient visits per day, total <br />average purchase size, and total operational days per quarter. The following assumptions are based on <br />comparable dispensary locations in the East Bay and general population demographics and consumption <br />rates. <br />• 250 Patients per day on average with 15% quarterly growth; <br />• Average individual purchase of $65† with 1% quarterly decrease attributed to competitive retail <br />margin compression and pass through savings as production efficiencies are realized; <br />• 78 operational days per quarter or 26 operational days per month <br /> <br />DSWC assumes the potential patient pool to be 3%‡ of the total population within a 30-minute drive of San <br />Leandro. Considering the total population of Alameda County (1.6M) and Contra Costa County (1.1M) we <br />assume the total population within 30-minutes drive of San Leandro to be approximately 1.0M. Thus, DSWC <br />assumes a potential patient pool of 30K individual patients within a 30-minute drive of San Leandro. Due to <br />competition, mostly from Oakland dispensaries, it is assumed that 2/3 of this potential patient pool, or 20K <br />patients, will frequent San Leandro dispensaries. DSWC further assumes that these patients obtain medical <br />Cannabis once per month. Thus, based on these assumptions approximately 20K patient transactions will <br />occur within San Leandro each month. Assuming a 50% share of San Leandro’s market, DSWC estimates <br />that approximately 10K patient transactions will be realized by DSWC each month, or 385 patient <br />transactions per day. To be conservative, DSWC chose to start our predictive model at 250 patients per day <br /> † Marijuana Business Daily (https://mjbizdaily.com/chart-week-average-marijuana-dispensary-purchase-amounts-range-60-100) ‡ Extrapolated from the percent of medical Cannabis patients statewide (1.9%; <br />http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=005889) adjusted higher to reflect the progressive leanings <br />of the Bay Area relative to the rest of California. <br />471