Laserfiche WebLink
SAN LEANDRO GENERAL PLAN UPDATE FINAL EIR <br />CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />COMMENTS AND RESPONSES <br />5-20 AUGUST 2016 <br />TABLE 5-1 COMMENTS AND RESPONSE MATRIX <br />Comment # Date Comment Response <br />Plan Update, submitted to the City of San Leandro by BCDC staff on December 2, 2014, <br />state that “the General Plan and the DEIR should acknowledge and describe the <br />Commission’s jurisdiction and permit authority.” Sections 4-8 Hydrology and Water <br />Quality, 4-9 Land Use and Planning, and 4-14 Utilities and Service Systems include <br />descriptions of BCDC jurisdiction and permit authority, and sections 4-3 Biological <br />Resources and 4-6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions also recognize the Commission’s authority <br />and role in regional planning. Page 4.9-13 states the San Leandro General Plan Update’s <br />compatibility with the Bay Plan, that no development projects are currently identified <br />under the proposed General Plan, and that any future development would be required <br />to comply with Bay Plan objectives and BCDC permit requirements. Additionally, on <br />pages 4.9-13 – 4.9-14, the DEIR lists the specific goals, policies, and actions of the <br />proposed General Plan that would ensure compatibility with the Bay Plan and protect <br />natural resources along the San Leandro shoreline. <br />C01-03 Sea Level Rise. Comments on the Notice of Preparation (NOP) of the DEIR for the San <br />Leandro General Plan Update, submitted to the City of San Leandro by BCDC staff on <br />December 2, 2014, state that “the DEIR should assess the potential for sea level rise <br />impacts on the Bay and its shoreline in the General Plan area. The assessment should use <br />the best available sea level rise projections to consider potential impacts in the General <br />Plan at mid- and end-of-century.”BCDC policies state that sea level rise risk assessments <br />should be prepared when planning shoreline areas. Page 4.8-7 acknowledges Executive <br />Order S-13-08 and the two sea level rise scenarios—16 inches by mid-century and 55 <br />inches by end-of-century—that Natural Resource Agencies are planning for. Page 4.9-4 <br />acknowledges BCDC climate change and sea level rise policies for projects: “The Bay Plan <br />contains policies which call for review with respect to the effects of climate change on <br />projects in BCDC’s jurisdiction, including the requirement that projects include a risk <br />assessment prepared by a qualified engineer to assure that the risk of flooding from sea <br />level rise is acceptable.” Appendix D of the DEIR includes a map of the current 100-year <br />flood event and 55 inches of sea level rise. However, this map is “for informational and <br />planning purposes,” and an assessment of the impacts of sea level rise on the Bay and <br />the shoreline of the City of San Leandro was not completed. Page 4-4 of the DEIR cites <br />cases California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District <br />(2015) 62 Cal.4th 369 and Ballona Wetlands Trust v. City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 <br />Cal.App.4th 455, 473-474 as to why the effects of sea level rise on the proposed project <br />are not subject to CEQA review. <br /> <br />Some specific evaluation of sea level rise is included in the DEIR. On page 4.3-18, sea <br />level rise impacts to and future considerations for a specific portion of the shoreline are <br />acknowledged in proposed General Plan Update Action OSC-6.5.C: Dredge Materials <br />Management Site: “Consider restoration alternatives for the former Dredge Materials <br />Management Site located east of the Tony Lema Golf Course and north of the Shoreline <br />Marshlands. Planning for this area should consider potential impacts related to sea level <br />The comment correctly states that page 4-4 of the Draft EIR cites the California <br />Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2015) 62 <br />Cal.4th 369 (CBIA), Ballona Wetlands Trust v. City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 <br />Cal.App.4th 455, 473-474 (Ballona) cases in explaining why sea level rise impacts on <br />the proposed project are not subject to CEQA review. The comment states that sea <br />level rise impacts to the San Leandro shoreline, including the proposed zoning <br />changes and preliminary components in the San Leandro Shoreline Development <br />Project should be analyzed. The Shoreline Development Project was the subject of <br />an EIR certified in July 2015 (SCH #2013072011). The Shoreline Development <br />Project EIR predates the CBIA case and includes an evaluation of sea level rise <br />impacts. The proposed San Leandro 2035 General Plan does not propose any <br />change to the Shoreline project land use designations, and analyzes the site under <br />its current land use designations. Proposed Zoning Code amendments are <br />described in Appendix B and do not include any map changes within the BCDC <br />jurisdiction. Nevertheless, the City agrees with the commenter on the importance of <br />planning adequately and proactively for sea level rise. Accordingly, the proposed <br />Plan includes action programs targeting planning on a development project level, <br />and equally important, on a citywide level. As stated on page 4-4 of the Draft EIR, <br />"Given San Leandro’s location on the San Francisco Bay shoreline, the City <br />recognizes that sea level rise is a local issue of concern." The proposed Plan states <br />on page 7-14, "In the future, sea level rise risk assessments will be required for <br />projects in areas where the long-term risk of coastal flooding is present. Such <br />assessments will need to address the likelihood of flooding and the need for <br />shoreline improvements such as levees and seawalls. The City itself will need to <br />engage in adaptation planning to protect public and private property in vulnerable <br />areas." Proposed General Plan Action LU-9.4.B is to, "Ensure that future <br />development at the shoreline takes place in an environmentally sensitive manner, <br />taking into consideration the potential effects of rising sea levels." Sea level rise is