My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action Items 2016 1121
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 1121
>
10A Action Items 2016 1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2016 5:08:45 PM
Creation date
11/16/2016 5:08:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
11/21/2016
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2016-160
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br />June, 2016 5 MRW & Associates, LLC <br /> <br />Table 1. Alameda County Average Technical and Economic Energy Efficiency Potential <br />Metric Technical Potential Economic Potential <br />Range (% of sales) 21% 16% 18% 15% <br />Potential (GWh) 1,623 1,237 1,391 1,159 <br />Table 2 provides a forecast of the market potential for energy efficiency based on a similar <br />analysis market forecasts from the CPUC potential studies. The row labeled “PG&E Goals” represents Alameda County’s share of the market potential forecast which formed the basis for PG&E’s 2015 energy efficiency program portfolio savings targets.16 That is, because Alameda <br />is in PG&E’s service area, it provides, and will continue to provide, energy efficiency programs <br />to Alameda county residents and businesses. This row shows this amount. The row labeled <br />“High Savings Scenario” represents the energy efficiency savings attributable to Alameda County in the CPUC potential study’s high savings scenario.17 The row labelled ”Incremental Potential” is the difference between PG&E’s 2015 portfolio goals for Alameda County and the <br />high savings scenario for the County. This row represents the total market potential that could be <br />served by CCA administered programs. The forecast presented in Table 2 <br />Table 2. Alameda County Incremental Energy Efficiency Market Potential (GWh)18 <br />Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 <br />Alameda Component of <br />PG&E Goals 25.9 35.8 24.6 29.4 41.1 48.2 50.0 25.9 <br />Alameda of High Savings <br />Scenario 44.2 59.8 56.6 65.6 71.7 84.2 88.4 44.2 <br />Incremental Potential 18.3 24.0 32.0 36.3 30.6 36.0 38.4 18.3 <br /> <br />While there are countless opportunities and approaches to achieve energy efficiency, several <br />examples of technologies and programs that will yield savings above what is being targeted <br />through the current portfolio of PG&E programs operating in Alameda County are listed below. <br />This includes initiatives that might compliment and leverage existing technologies or programs, or highlight emerging opportunities that are in design or early deployment. <br /> High efficiency LED lighting initiatives targeting high lumen per watt technologies. <br /> <br />16 Net GWh, as defined by the CEC Mid Additional Achievable Energy Efficiency (AAEE) forecast 17 Referred to as the High AAEE Potential Scenario <br />18 Savings values do not include energy efficiency potential associated with building codes, appliance standards, or estimates for the agricultural or mining market sectors. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.