My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action Items 2016 1121
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 1121
>
10A Action Items 2016 1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2016 5:08:45 PM
Creation date
11/16/2016 5:08:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
11/21/2016
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2016-160
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br />June, 2016 32 MRW & Associates, LLC <br /> <br />Chapter 5: Macroeconomic Impacts <br />Each of the three scenarios discussed thus far is next examined for job impacts within Alameda <br />County. To understand just how job impacts can come about, and the extent of those changes <br />(plus or minus), a brief description of elements associated with the CCA and how they influence <br />the existing economy is provided. <br />How a CCA interacts with the Surrounding Economy <br />The establishment and operation of a CCA creates a new set of spending (also referred to as demands) elements as a community changes the type of electricity generation they want to <br />purchase, where the new mix of generation is (to be) located, adjustments necessary for existing <br />generating assets of the provider utility, and implications on customers’ bills as a result of retail <br />rate differentials. Some of these new elements have temporary effects, while others have long- <br />term effects. Investment in locally situated elements (such as operation & maintenance) will result in the direct creation of jobs, and when a job is created in a sector, there will be a <br />multiplier response on “backwardly-linked” jobs with supplier businesses. The new elements <br />include: <br /> Administration – [direct jobs, long-term effect] county staffing, professional-technical services and I/T-database services <br /> Net Rate Savings (or bill savings) – [long-term effect] county households have an <br />increase in their spending ability, county commercial and industrial energy customers <br />experience a reduction in their costs-of-doing business which makes them each more competitive, garnering more business that requires more employees, and municipal energy customers can provide more local services which requires more local government <br />staff. <br /> New Renewable Capacity Investment within County – [direct jobs, short-term] <br /> New Renewable Operations within County – [direct jobs, long-term] <br /> New Energy-efficiency within County – [direct jobs, short-term] <br /> Net Generating Capacity and Operations offsets for PG&E outside of county – [direct jobs, short & long-term] <br />To frame expectations around how many direct jobs can be created in the county from the above <br />CCA elements, consideration must be given to (a) how much of the spending associated with the <br />CCA scenario is fulfilled by a within county business or resident workforce, and (b) what do <br />these locally-fulfilled dollars represent in terms of current annual county business activity, e.g. is this a large spending event. <br />Table 15 presents these considerations, which are shaped in part by assumptions defined by the <br />MRW study team. For instance, the labor share required on the annual investments (or the <br />operating budget) was assumed to be 100 percent satisfied by within county resident laborers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.