My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action Items 2016 1121
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 1121
>
10A Action Items 2016 1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2016 5:08:45 PM
Creation date
11/16/2016 5:08:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
11/21/2016
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2016-160
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br />June, 2016 33 MRW & Associates, LLC <br /> <br />Table 15. Initial Investment within Alameda County from Proposed CCA <br /> 2017 to 2030 <br />CCA <br />Scenario <br />Local Capture on RE <br />investments (billion$) <br />As % of County’s <br />Total RE <br />investment <br />As % of County’s <br />Expected Economic <br />Activity <br />Bill Savings <br />(billion$) <br />1 $0.42 44% 0.01% $1.57 <br />2 $0.42 44% 0.01% $1.51 <br />3 $0.45 45% 0.01% $0.52 <br /> <br />As can be seen from the table, the initial local investment that would result from building and <br />operating additional renewable projects in Alameda County between the years 2017 to 2030 <br />represents a very small portion of the County’s total expected economic activity, 40 even assuming all of the project costs are directed locally (usually 56% of the project costs would be <br />funneled outside the county due to procurement of equipment from outside the county). By <br />contrast bill savings for scenarios 1 and 2 provide over three fold the benefits of initial local <br />investment. These bill savings indirectly stimulate the economy and ultimately create jobs. <br />Table 16 illustrates this through high-level results expressed as average annual job changes for the three CCA scenarios. While scenarios 1 and 2 create nearly identical direct jobs (due to <br />comparable investment in local renewable projects), scenario 1 creates far more TOTAL jobs. <br />This is due to the higher bill savings under scenario 1. Scenario 3 creates a few more direct jobs, <br />but far fewer total jobs, due to decreased bill savings as compared to the other two scenarios. As <br />a result, its total job impact is 55 percent of the scenario 1 total job impact. A more detailed discussion of these results will follow later. <br /> <br />Table 16. Average Annual Jobs created in Alameda County by the CCA – <br />Direct and Total Impacts <br /> 2017 – to – 2030 County Impacts <br />CCA <br />Scenario <br />Local Capture on RE <br />investments <br />(billion$) <br />Bill Savings <br />(billion$) <br />Average <br />Annual <br />DIRECT Jobs <br />Average <br />Annual <br />TOTAL Jobs <br />1 $0.42 $1.57 165 1322 <br />2 $0.42 $1.51 166 1286 <br />3 $0.45 $0.52 174 731 <br /> <br /> <br />40 Forecast to be $3,500 billion (nominal). Source REMI Policy Insight model, Alameda County forecast.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.