Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Proposals for Revising Northern California Metroplex – Alameda County/Contra Costa County 12 <br />Table 4: HUSSH departure sample showing noise levels for individual aircrafts off runway 30 at Oakland Airport for <br />February 20 and 21, 2016. Data collected by portable noise monitor installed at 551 Creedon Circle in Bay Farm Island, <br />Alameda by Oakland Airport noise office. <br /> <br /> <br />HUSSH TWO — NOISE FORUMREQUESTS: <br /> <br />Short Term <br /> <br />The current routing of the HUSSH TWO brings aircraft ground tracks closer to BFI, Harbor Bay, <br />and Alameda resulting in increased noise. The short-term solution would be for Air Traffic Control <br />to assign headings to aircraft departing OAK runway 30 that restore the initial SILENT ground track. <br />Other issues with the HUSSH TWO departure and proposed solutions are detailed in this document <br />and are addressed separately. Additionally, the FAA should ensure aircraft remain on their filed <br />route and not turn prior to REBAS intersection. <br /> <br />Longer Term <br /> <br />The Noise Forum is requesting FAA evaluate the HUSSH procedure and adjust it to replicate the <br />SILENT SID ground track and require aircraft to fly to REBAS unless safety dictates otherwise. <br /> <br />The Noise Forum requests the FAA consider the following: <br /> <br />1. moving HUSSH waypoint southward as much as feasible to facilitate a sharper left turn <br />by aircraft after departing OAK Runway 30; and <br /> <br />2. regulate and eliminate early turns off of HUSSH by issuing an FAA Air Traffic Control <br />directive that aircraft fly the full HUSSH departure all the way to REBAS intersection for <br />published noise abatement purposes unless safety dictates otherwise; and <br /> <br />3. modifying the location of REBAS closer to the Bay to better mitigate noise at <br />Point Richmond; and <br />204