Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />RE: Exhibit A -CONSISTENCY MEMORANDUM FOR THE SLTC MIXED-USE PROJECT (PLN16-oo67) <br />JULY 17, 2017 <br />Paae 21 <br />emissions associated with project -related new vehicular trips and indirect source emissions, such as <br />electricity usage for lighting. <br />BAAQMD does not have an adopted threshold of significance for construction -related GHG emissions. <br />For operational GHG emissions, the applicable BAAQMD threshold of significance is whetherthe project <br />would exceed i,1oo metric tons per year of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO e) or if the project would <br />generate 4.6 metrictons of CO,e perservice population peryear. <br />The proposed project's service population (project employees, patrons, and residents) is identified in <br />order to present the project's service population efficiency in comparison to the BAAQMD efficiency - <br />based threshold of 4.6 metric tons Of CO2e per service population per year. The majority of people <br />visiting the residential component of the project would be residents. According to the California <br />Department of Finance (DOF), residential dwellings in San Leandro average 2.74 occupants perdwelling, <br />which would result in 5403 project residents. <br />The majority of people visiting the commercial uses associated with the project would be customers and <br />employees. In orderto estimate the number of customers and employees who visit the site, the number <br />of potential project -related daily vehicle trips is divided by two to account for each service population <br />member making one trip to and one trip from the nonresidential use; therefore, each project customer <br />and employee would count for two trips. This is a conservative assumption since each vehicle is assumed <br />to accommodate only one person, whereas many of the vehicles would accommodate more than one <br />person. As cited in the traffic analysis, included as Appendix C, prepared by Kimely Horn (2017), the <br />proposed project would generate approximately 4,388 trips per day. However, 700 of these dailytrips are <br />attributable to the residential component of the project; thus, the nonresidential land uses would <br />generate approximately 3,688 trips per day. The total number of trips per day is divided bytwo (1,844) to <br />derive the service population attributable to customers and employees. Therefore, the project service <br />population would be 2,384. <br />Asshown in Table 8 below, dividing the project GHG emissions yields a metricton perservice population <br />ratio of o.6. This ratio of o.6 metric tons of CO2e per service population annually is below the BAAQMD <br />efficiency -based threshold Of 4.6. Therefore, the project would not exceed BAAQMD significance <br />thresholds foroperational GHG emissions and would result in a less than significant GHG impact. <br />The TOD Strategy EIRfound that GHG impacts for TOD Strategy buildout would be less than significant <br />after implementation of TOD EIR mitigation measures AQ -2a and -b. The projectwould complywith the <br />City's updated General Plan EIR mitigation measures AQ -2a and -2b, which require projects to comply <br />with the current Bay Area Air Quality Management District's basic control measures for reducing GHG <br />emissions. As such, the project would not exceed the service population operational GHG Emissions <br />BAAQMD threshold and the impact would be less than significant. Therefore, no further analysis is <br />needed, and the project would be consistent with the City's TOD Strategy EIR. <br />3 7.74 residents/dwelling x297 dwelling units = 54o residents <br />